Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Passes Defense Bill Rife with Antigay Amendments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 08:53 AM
Original message
House Passes Defense Bill Rife with Antigay Amendments
http://www.shewired.com/soapbox/house-passes-defense-bill-rife-antigay-amendments

The House of Representatives on Thursday approved its version of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act with three controversial, antigay amendments, one of which is aimed at delaying repeal implementation of "don't ask, don't tell."

The amendments, all opposed by the Obama administration, would require the four service branch chiefs to sign off on DADT repeal, affirm that the Defense of Marriage Act applies to Defense Department policies, and prohibit weddings for same-sex couples at military facilities — as well as bar military chaplains from performing such weddings in their official capacity. The House version of the defense authorization bill was approved by a 322 to 96 vote.

In a Tuesday statement of policy, the White House objected to any legislative attempt to delay repeal of DADT, which would "create uncertainty for service members and their families," according to the statement.

The Senate is expected to begin debate on its version of the defense spending bill in June, Stars and Stripesreports.

Update:

Servicemembers United executive director Alexander Nicholson issued the following statement on passage of the House bill:

"The passage of the defense authorization bill with these hostile amendments included comes as no surprise, and it should not become a cause for concern as long as our allies in the Senate and the President all stand strong and refuse to support a defense bill containing these amendments," Nicholson said. "These amendments were nothing short of a waste of time by lawmakers who were sent to Washington to do serious business and a waste of taxpayer money. The Pentagon, the President, and the American people have made it abundantly clear — we are moving forward and building a stronger military free of unnecessary discrimination."

Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said via the organization's website that the amendment offered by Rep. Todd Akin to prohibit on-base weddings for same-sex couples is "a dangerous proposition" that would restrict "the religious liberties of chaplains and service members."

"We must look to repeal supporters in the Senate, where the defense bill will be taken up next and where we are better positioned than in the House," Sarvis said. "We need to beat back this harmful language and make sure it does not survive in conference committee."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. KNR...another reason why the courts need to strike this down...
so we're not held hostage to these assholes in the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I feel like we've gone back 40 years in one election cycle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. If it were only 40!!!
I can't beleive anyone voted these fools in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Take a wild guess how the Texas House members voted... with FEW exceptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Actually, I doubt what I say would be a guess...I can say with conviction
how they voted! Twits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Honestly did no one not see this coming?
I wonder how many Democrats are secretly breathing a sigh of relief right now, especially the big kahuna.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnypneumatic Donating Member (461 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ninety-five Democrats voted with Republicans to pass the bill
so many of our democratic party friends voting against us again... gee thanks guys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC