Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Controversial Nominee Approved to Court in Time for Prop. 8 Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 01:45 PM
Original message
Controversial Nominee Approved to Court in Time for Prop. 8 Hearing
The California Supreme Court will include a new voice, Goodwin Liu, on the bench when it hears a Proposition 8 case Tuesday.

The court is set to decide whether supporters of the Proposition 8 amendment can defend it in a court challenge if the state government won't. Liu has been a vocal proponent of gay rights, and his nomination to a federal appeals court by President Obama was scuttled earlier this year in part because he once said defining marriage only as a union between one man and one woman is unconstitutional.

But Liu's nomination was unanimously approved today by the state Commission on Judicial Appointments, which reviews nominees. So it seems Liu was too liberal for Washington and the Senate Republicans who delayed a vote on his nomination, but not for California.

The Los Angeles Times reports that no one testified against Liu. Letters against Liu's nomination by California governor Jerry Brown included one from Judicial Watch, a conservative group that called Liu an "activist" — a label repeated many times in Washington before Liu withdrew his own nomination.

http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/09/01/Controversial_Nominee_Approved_to_Court_in_Time_for_Prop_8_Hearing/
Refresh | +9 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. This could bite us on the ass
Many principled liberals have a wide definition of standing which would be the opposite of what we would want to happen in this case. I actually believe that they do have standing as should any citizen when the government refuses to defend laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We shall see.
I personnaly don't have a problem with the Government not defending a law when it affects the rights of a minority, until the court steps in to settle the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC