Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

11th Circuit's Abuzz With Sex Toy Litigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 02:25 PM
Original message
11th Circuit's Abuzz With Sex Toy Litigation
History fails to attribute to patriot Patrick Henry the statement "Give me sex toys or give me death," so therefore it's not surprising that the legal battle continues over whether the right to obtain and use appliances intended for sexual gratification is included within the liberty protected under the U.S. Constitution.

A number of states still have laws that make it a crime to sell or distribute sex toys, and over the past several years there has been a notable amount of litigation throughout many southern states concerning whether these laws remain constitutional in the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, which holds that states cannot outlaw homosexual sodomy between consenting adults.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals -- the federal appellate court that hears appeals from Alabama, Florida and Georgia -- has in recent years become a veritable hub for sex toy–related litigation. In July 2004, the 11th Circuit examined whether an Alabama law prohibiting the sale of sex toys violated a purported constitutional right to sexual privacy. By a vote of 2–1, the court rejected the challenge to the Alabama law.

The conclusion of the majority opinion in Williams v. Attorney General of Alabama explains: "we hold that the district court committed reversible error in concluding that the Due Process Clause 'encompass a right to use sexual devices like ... vibrators, dildos, anal beads, and artificial vaginas.'" Yet instead of terminating the case, the 11th Circuit remanded the lawsuit so that an Alabama–based federal district court could consider whether public morality continued to provide a rational basis for the law in the aftermath of Lawrence v. Texas. Late last month, in a 56–page ruling, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama entered final judgment in favor of Alabama, rejecting all challenges to the law. The time for appeal from that ruling has not yet expired, so it is possible that this case could make yet another trip to the 11th Circuit.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1142601438176
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1.  I hope the Ala. prohibition is appealed.
I haven't read the ruling, but I just don't see these laws holding up much longer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. "...so therefore it's not surprising..."
I have to disagree. I find it very surprising that anyone would actually give a crap whether or not someone else buys a sex toy.

Don't like sex toys? Don't buy them. Problem solved.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Don't like what's on TV, don't watch
Don't like gays getting married, don't pay attention

Don't like Brokeback Mountain being shown in the theater, don't buy a ticket

Don't like gay people having Pride Parades, don't go

See how easy that is? Duh. :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gator_in_Ontario Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great post!
It reminded me of an HBO Real Sex episode...
There is a dildo factory in Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas...somewhere below the bible belt. There were grandma types in hair nets making sure the dildoes were OK. All those folks will be flung out of work if this passes! I don't imagine they will be thrilled about that.
Just think about the lobbyist possibilities!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Adam & Eve
Carboro, NC. is the place you are thinking of, I believe.

Phillip Harvey who owns A&E is a great man, philanthropist, etc. The city has given him awards, and he is also very involved in (free) condom distribution in Africa.

These rulings won't really affect them. The only thing that is illegal is selling a sex toy as a sex toy -- retail. I don't think their manufacturing and distribution will be affected.

Thing is, Adult stores exist regardless of the laws. If someone walks up to the register with a toy, it is legal to sell it to them, unless you happen to comment "that is a great toy for clitoral stimulation" -- then it becomes illegal. In states where toy sales are illegal (thankfully, not Ohio), you'll always find a sign similar to "ALL ITEMS SOLD FOR NOVELTY PURPOSES ONLY".

Here in Ohio, only the movies I sell are potentially illegal. I can demo and explain toys all I want.
Which is good because I get to help a lot of people out. You'd be suprised at the number of middle aged couples coming in for erection enhancement -- who would most likely never say anything to their Dr., and can't aford $10/pill for viagra.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC