Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ga. Tech sued by conservative students

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
kweerwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:01 PM
Original message
Ga. Tech sued by conservative students
Two Georgia Institute of Technology students have filed a federal lawsuit against the Atlanta university charging that current policies, including a "Safe Space" program dedicated to dispelling anti-gay stereotypes, limit their political and religious speech.

"The Institute threatens punishment ranging from sanction to expulsion for any student or student organization that engages in 'intolerant' speech, expression and behavior," states the lawsuit, filed last month in the Northern District Court of Georgia.

The case was brought by the Alliance Defense Fund, an Arizona-based legal group that describes itself as a "Christ-centered" organization dedicated to "defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding and litigation."

The ADF represents Tech students Ruth Malhotra and Orit Sklar. Both are members of the school's College Republicans as well as separate religious student groups. Their lawsuit also contends that conservative student organizations are denied school funding while liberal groups, such as the university’s gay support group, are funded.

http://www.washblade.com/thelatest/thelatest.cfm?blog_id=6210

... an Arizona-based legal group that describes itself as a "Christ-centered" organization ... Meanwhile, Christ would probably describe this group as a bunch of evil wingnuts who misuse his name and whom he is looking forward to bitch-slapping for all eternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bigots for Jesus!
What a great group of intolerant assholes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud_Democratt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Little Bush's....kinda like
Hitler Youth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, LOOK!!!
Tomorrow's President and Vice-President!!!!

I'll be dead by then. Thank god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbernardini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. So they admit that they wish to engage in "intolerant" speech?
Nice. Very nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. tried similar shit two years ago...
Check out this post at Jesus' General, and click on the link at the PS. http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2006_04_09_patriotboy_archive.html#114473850607938579

The little bitch has been trying to find some angle to become the next Michelle Malkin for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Fawkes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Try doing that in the UK...
They aren't as tolerant about bigot speech as we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. There seems to be a movement building
that is entirely about defending the rights of bigots to be bigots anywhere at any time.

We all see them using the language of free speach, but they are taking a vicious step further. They are demanding the right to intimidate, to belittle, and to harrass.

If they succeed, they'll have a legal right to attack us and harrass us anyplace except maybe on our own private property. If people don't think we're second class citizens now, will they believe it then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-14-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. What I don't get ...
is how they state they're "limited of their political and religious speech", yet are the first to block ANYONE who would verture into their realm to discuss gays in a positive light.

But, hey, that's different, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC