Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Log Cabin Republicans are crying foul. Should the Smith amendment be considered?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 10:34 PM
Original message
Poll question: Log Cabin Republicans are crying foul. Should the Smith amendment be considered?
Edited on Fri Jan-26-07 10:37 PM by DemKR
I wanted to post a tidbit that I found circling the internet tonight and will try to debunk the LCR spin.

The gay Republican group says, "Democrats in the U.S. Senate are blocking important pro-gay legislation offered by Republican Senator Gordon Smith from Oregon. The Domestic Partner Health Benefits Equity Act will allow self-employed individuals to deduct the cost of health coverage for their domestic partners."

Well, first thing's first. The Democrats are not trying to "block" The Domestic Partner Health Benefits Equity Act. Baucus and Reid however, oppose the way Smith is trying to go about this.

It's clear that Gordon Smith is worried about his 2008 re-election bid and how his two-time vote for a federal marriage amendment that would have essentially banned what this act entails (hypocrisy alert).

The point is, LCR is either spinning things their way or is grossly misinformed. Baucus and Reid intend to bring the act up very soon, but--Smith is trying to make it part of a minimum wage bill, likely so he can take the credit for it and try to fool people into thinking he has a pro-gay rights voting record.

I tend to agree with Max Baucus on this one. I don't think this act has any place in a minimum wage bill--it needs to be a clean bill. I don't think Gordon Smith speaks for me as a gay person and Log Cabin Republicans certainly do not either.

I am new to DU and am happy to be posting in the GLBT forum. I'd like to know what you think about the Smith amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bdrube Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Log Cabin Republicans Need to Wake Up
If the Christo-Fascists ever DO take over, they'll be the
first ones rounded up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebellious Republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is it not an oxymoron to use gay and republican in the same context?
I wonder how Mary Cheney feels about gay marriage, if there is no such thing, then would not her child be illegitimate? I wonder how she feels about stem cell research, is not in vitro fertilization playing God as well. I wonder how the pastor of the United Methodist church that Dick Cheney attends, feels about gay relationships and children being born out of wedlock by a same sex couple?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glorfindel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Welcome to DU!!!
I think the Smith amendment has nothing to do with the minimum wage and should be considered separately. Also, I think the Log Cabin Repukes are pathetic, deluded, self-loathing, and useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Poor LCRs
They will grasp at anything that might indicate that the Rethugs are changing their attitude toward us. You'd think that having been kicked in the balls by their party as many times as they have that they'd get a clue. Unfortunately there is no correlation between being gay and being smart.

As for Sen Smith, my understanding is that he votes a straight Bush party line until election time is on the horizon and then he quick becomes a moderate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBiologist Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-27-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am a functionalist
I dont care how we get equal rights at this point. I don't care if fully legalizing gay marriage takes place as a rider to the federal budget at this point. As far as I am concerned, the electorate does not have a legitimate right to vote on my constitutionally guaranteed rights anyway (any of them), so I dont care how duplicitous a congressman has to be in order to get a single step closer to me being something better than a second class citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-28-07 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm with you on legalizing marriage equality
But that's not what Sen Smith is proposing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC