Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We Knew This Was Coming-Contitutional Amendment To Ban Gay Marriage Filed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 04:36 PM
Original message
We Knew This Was Coming-Contitutional Amendment To Ban Gay Marriage Filed
109th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. J. RES. 1
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage.

Look it up in Thomas's.
They are filing the Constitutional Amendment to ban gay marriage AGAIN....
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:3:./temp/~c109fcECed::
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. SJ Resolution number ONE! The FIRST thing they filed???
THIS is their priority???

Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Bet Your Ass!!
I noticed that, too.

And I wasn't surprised to see Santorum's name attached to it, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've already contacted my Senators and Representative.
Edited on Wed Feb-09-05 04:46 PM by terrya
Senator Durbin and Representative Jan Schakowsky will vote against it, I know. I HOPE my new Senator, Barack Obama, will do the same. I will be majorly pissed if he votes for this disgusting, hateful piece of shite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He won't. You have nothing to worry about.
My 2 Senators in KS will fall all over themselves to be the first t vote against it and then brag about doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sorry, The Link Won't Work
Use This instead...

http://thomas.loc.gov/

Then, hit the radio button over to Look up by Bill number (it defaults to bill name)
And in the search field type this

S. J. RES. 1

and it will be right there for you. I'm also not surprised to find BOTH of my worthless shithead Senators from texas signed onto this one. (Cornyn and Hutchison)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Here's A Better One (I think) Using TinyURL Service
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's What The Fundie Christians Want... Faith-Based Hatred.
Edited on Wed Feb-09-05 05:16 PM by arwalden
Heh... and people wonder why I'm so hostile towards fundies.

"Oh just be quiet, Allen." "Don't make a fuss, Allen." "Take one for the team, Allen." "Be nice, Allen." "Sit down, Allen." "Sometimes bigotry is okay, Allen."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Be bold and mighty forces will come to your aid.
Got your back. :hi: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Hey... You know what?
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy_Stephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Allen....
feeling a bit testy are we?

Suck it up brother. This is the new reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaBloom6 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. It was inevitable. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duncan Grant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Homophobia provides a steady source of revenue.
Edited on Wed Feb-09-05 07:25 PM by 94114_San_Francisco
It's a shame that the exploitation of bigotry and ignorance isn't unlawful - or immoral - or unethical.

Think about it. Who benefits from all this grandstanding? This is nothing more than "special interest" legislation (or political payback) for the TV evangelists or 'men of faith' who build large Christian flocks/empires.

Follow the sound of the "Kah-ching" and get pissed off. It should piss you off.

edit: clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stepup2 Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Of all the issues facing this country
they choose this as the first. :puke:

And will ANY one point out this fact or will they go hide under a desk. :nuke:

I want my tax money back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigMatto Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. The last attempt failed in an election year
So I don't expect that this attempt will get out of the Senate either. There's a sizeable chunk of Republicans who oppose tinkering with the Constitution as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I think one of them said that they know they don't have the votes
for it

they're putting it out there for the fundies

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does the language still ban Civil Unions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian_Expat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Pick one of these three possibilities:
Yes, definitely, absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. "Or the legal incidents thereof"
The religious-reich calls civil unions "counterfeit marriages" and wants those banned as well.

That not only bans civil unions, but it also bans the granting of any individual right normally reserved for married people.

Think about that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mermaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I Assume Common-Law Marriages (ala Shackin' Up For A LOOOONG Time)
would be a thing of the past, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PodPoet Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. Amendment
Bush has already said he won't make this his fight...at least not this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
21. When this comes up....can the Queen of South Carolina be outed?
I'm referring to the senior Senator from South Carolina. He'll vote for this, that's a certainity. My feeling is that if you're gay, and you vote for hateful, discriminatory legislation that affects gay and lesbian folks...you should a pay a price for this. It's outing time for closet cases who would willingly sell us down the river.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » GLBT Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC