|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-17-11 08:00 PM Original message |
Out of the Labyrinth (Of evidence based nonsense) |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-17-11 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. What? Nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HuckleB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-17-11 10:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. He doesn't know either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-17-11 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. "Evidence based nonsense"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-18-11 05:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. No shit here. Quackwatch is an extreme site, be careful there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-18-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I thought evidence was bad--yet you just posted some. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-18-11 06:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. "Extreme"? LOL, okay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-18-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. It doesn't agree with the CAM division of the NIH, it doesn't agree with the German Commision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-18-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Of course they don't agree with most CAM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-19-11 05:15 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Love your sig btw, reminds me of another quack so to speak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-19-11 05:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. What reasons do you have for believing Sagan a quack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-19-11 06:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. The only reason I don't consider it a quack site is because I have read it for more than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-19-11 09:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. But wait, didn't you say you're against "evidence based nonsense"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-19-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. You can have it both ways in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-20-11 09:39 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yes, it was quite possibly the most confusing OP ever posted on DU. Sorry for that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-20-11 02:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I'm still confused... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-20-11 02:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I am all for evidence based science and medicine as long as it doesn't do more harm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
EvolveOrConvolve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-11 11:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. So how do you make the determination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-18-11 05:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Something else you may like: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
laconicsax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-18-11 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
4. Wait...what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-20-11 10:23 AM Response to Reply #4 |
19. The quack community has used "evidence-based" as a synonym for "bad" for years. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-18-11 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
8. I'm confused. Isn't what you usually post, vits/supplements, based on evidence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-18-11 06:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yup, poor choice of words there, however those who cannot connect nutritional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Dec 21st 2024, 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC