Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obesity is less common in pot smokers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 09:00 PM
Original message
Obesity is less common in pot smokers
Oh wow, talk about your counter-intuitive findings. I wonder which way the arrow of causality is pointing on this one, or if there's a third variable driving both?

The researchers then used survey participants' self-reported smoking habits to reveal that about a quarter of people who didn't smoke pot were obese. By comparison, only 16—17 percent of cannabis users were found to be overweight. In fact, obesity was found to be even less common among people who smoked pot more frequently.
Link: http://io9.com/5837742/obesity-is-less-common-in-pot-smokers
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good to know....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Verrry interesting!
There goes my final reason for avoiding the stuff -- other than the legal issue, of course.

I was always afraid I'd succumb to the munchies and end up the size of a barn (not just "pleasingly plump," as my grandmother used to say).

Time to rethink this situation....



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-11 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, I'm not thin yet, but this news encourages me to keep trying.
Gonna smoke myself svelte.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Correlation is not causation.
Another statistical factoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Who said it was?
I said, "I wonder which way the arrow of causation points" and "or if there's a third variable driving both". It's only two epidemiological studies (albeit run on two very large datasets) so it can only prove correlation, not causation. However, assuming the correlation is valid* it's fine to speculate on what influences A might have on B, B on A or if unknown C (more likely unknowns C, D, E, F, G and H) is influencing both A and B.

*IMHO there are a number of problems with these two studies that make it hard to say whether or not the correlation is valid. However, taken on its own, it's an interesting finding and suggests avenues for further research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The OP is about a statistical correlation.
It is therefore entirely reasonable to point out that it means essentially nothing in terms of causation, lest somebody start smoking pot in naive hopes of losing weight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Most people I knew who smoked pot
Edited on Fri Sep-09-11 12:17 AM by Confusious
Were hyperactive. It calmed them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-11 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Pot, like most "natural" drugs, has many effects, and results depend a lot on dosage.
As well as varietal issues. It can be speedy, it can be slow, it can make you think, it can make you drool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-11 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. PS: I don't find the findings counter-intuitive at all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Jack2632 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Was something missing from the study?
This is pretty interesting. I mean, it could be another benefit? I wonder whether there's a real correlation - I didn't notice a statistical significance anywhere in the article - was that left out on purpose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. This is a good analysis of the study.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC