Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Skin-to-skin Contact Is Analgesic - newborns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
RedOnce Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 01:59 PM
Original message
Skin-to-skin Contact Is Analgesic - newborns

Skin-to-skin contact is analgesic in healthy newborns.


Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105(1):e14.

Gray L, Watt L, Blass EM.

Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. lag@bu.edu

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether skin-to-skin contact between mothers and their newborns will reduce the pain experienced by the infant during heel lance. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 newborn infants were studied. INTERVENTIONS: Infants were assigned randomly to either being held by their mothers in whole body, skin-to-skin contact or to no intervention (swaddled in crib) during a standard heel lance procedure. OUTCOME MEASURES: The effectiveness of the intervention was determined by comparing crying, grimacing, and heart rate differences between contact and control infants during and after blood collection. RESULTS: Crying and grimacing were reduced by 82% and 65%, respectively, from control infant levels during the heel lance procedure. Heart rate also was reduced substantially by contact. CONCLUSION: Skin-to-skin contact is a remarkably potent intervention against the pain experienced during heel stick in newborns.

Publication Types:
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial

PMID: 10617751

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=10617751&query_hl=4&itool=pubmed_DocSum



A warm touch improves oxygenation in newborn babies.


Daga SR, Ahuja VK, Lunkad NG.

Neonatal Unit, Cama and Albless Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Oxygen saturation was studied in eight newborn babies, seven preterm and one term, with and without caressing by the mother while receiving gavage feeds. The babies were stable with regard to cardiorespiratory and neurological status. Four babies were still receiving head-box oxygen. The oxygen saturation levels were similar before feeds. However, the levels were significantly higher with caressing at 10, 20 and 30 min after the feed in babies not receiving oxygen and at 20 and 30 min after feeds in babies receiving oxygen.

PMID: 9680785

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=9680785&query_hl=4&itool=pubmed_DocSum




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. We need studies to tell us what we already know
Like the story the other day that toddlers learn to talk by hearing the words for things they are interested in. Another big DUH!

no offense to you but it seems odd to me we keep seeing new studies coming out that really only verify what human (animal) instinct already tells us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Instinct tells us a lot that's nonsense, too
Like there are monsters in the darkness, for example. Studies like these help to separate the useful instinctive understanding from the bullshit instinctive understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedOnce Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Good point, but scientific proof seems to be a prerequisite for
posting in the Health Forum...even for things that verify what human (animal) instinct already tells us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting! I've heard reports like this for several years, but
I don't know that I'd ever seen a study of a specific pain-relief effect. Of course, it's hard to assess whether it's actually pain or simply anxiety/fear, but I don't know that it makes a difference.

I've read about baby mice (I think it was mice) in labs that were stroked with a soft brush--like a makeup brush--to simulate cleaning by their mother's tongue. The ones that received the brushing fared better than those that did not.

Interesting though this is, I hope it doesn't lead to unjustified leaps such as "skin contact relieves pain in adults." That may or may not be the case, but this study doesn't address it one way or the other.

Neat story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedOnce Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. "unjustified leaps"...oh, oh...he's on to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Well, previous studies of a couple of decades ago cited
faster weight gain, improved oxygenation, and fewer signs of distress when the preemies were put on artificial sheepskin pads rather than the usual crib sheets.

It makes sense. Wouldn't YOU rather sleep on something soft and warm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Curious: What is the procedure of "heel lancing" for? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizMoonstar Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. it's how you take a blood sample from a baby, i believe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Thanks, LizMoonstar.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizMoonstar Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. np duder - i saw it on TV! see, tv is good for you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's an ancient tradition
It's intended to guarantee that the son grows up to kill his father, marry his mother, and then put out his eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Orrexipus? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedOnce Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Alrighty....
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. These studies reinvented the wheel because this stuff has been
known for decades. In neonatal intensive care units, where preemies can't tolerate much skin to skin contact, putting them on artificial sheepskin pads has much the same effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC