Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cancer From the Kitchen?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:47 PM
Original message
Cancer From the Kitchen?
The battle over health care focuses on access to insurance, or tempests like the one that erupted over new mammogram guidelines.

But what about broader public health challenges? What if breast cancer in the United States has less to do with insurance or mammograms and more to do with contaminants in our water or air -- or in certain plastic containers in our kitchens? What if the surge in asthma and childhood leukemia reflect, in part, the poisons we impose upon ourselves?

This last week I attended a fascinating symposium at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, exploring whether certain common chemicals are linked to breast cancer and other ailments.

Dr. Philip Landrigan, the chairman of the department of preventive medicine at Mount Sinai, said that the risk that a 50-year-old white woman will develop breast cancer has soared to 12 percent today, from 1 percent in 1975. (Some of that is probably a result of better detection.) Younger people also seem to be developing breast cancer: This year a 10-year-old in California, Hannah, is fighting breast cancer and recording her struggle on a blog.

Likewise, asthma rates have tripled over the last 25 years, Dr. Landrigan said. Childhood leukemia is increasing by 1 percent per year. Obesity has surged. One factor may be lifestyle changes — like less physical exercise and more stress and fast food — but some chemicals may also play a role.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/opinion/06kristof.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Might increased exposure to electromagnetic fields be a contributor?
I know a lot of professional seamstresses. The percentage of them who have develop breast cancer seems mighty high. Guess what equipment they use for hours each day is in close proximity to breasts.

Always wondered about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think there is something to the emfs. It's also possible that the emfs have
a synergistic relationship with chemicals and cancer in the body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And what study or physical process indicates this to be true? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. No studies. Straight from my intuition. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Although there is this from the World Heath Organization
"Low-frequency magnetic fields induce circulating currents within the human body. The strength of these currents depends on the intensity of the outside magnetic field. If sufficiently large, these currents could cause stimulation of nerves and muscles or affect other biological processes."
http://www.who.int/peh-emf/about/WhatisEMF/en/index1.html

This only demonstrates an effect on anything with an electrical charge in the body, chemicals included. There has been no conclusive proof that emfs cause cancer.

I also don't know of any studies done in this area or the area of synergistic actions of various chemicals with each other. As I said, my suspicions are intuitive, nothing more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I just checked my microwave containers (they're all Rubbermaid, Glad and Ziploc)
and they all say "5", so I guess they're OK. I suppose I should replace the ones that look rough, and stop putting them in the dishwasher and microwave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. OMG ...
a ten year old! Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm waiting on the results from the "Sister Study"
My sisters and I are part of the sisters of breast cancer siblings. This was a very involved and detailed study following us through the years. Reams of questionnaires, blood work and dust samples from my house.

http://www.sisterstudy.org/English/index1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Absolutely
there is a huge body of environmetnal research that implicates chemical exposures in many of our illnesses. That information just sits there until action causes it to cross over into practical knowledge for the medical community.
Corporations are well aware of the channels for this to happen and block this info. For example, the occupational/environmental medical group in the US has been taken over by corporate medical directors. Journals won't publish these articles.

Philip Landrigan should receive a medal from the president - he has been advocating for environmental health, especially for children, for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-07-09 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. one way to lower the chances of breast cancer
avoid grilled or seared meat

http://www.sph.sc.edu/news/meatstudy.htm

That would be a much better public health measure than having mammograms every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC