http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2010/01/a-couple-of-things-to-remember-about-that-blueberryjuice-study.html"...
Researchers at the University of Cincinnati compared nine elderly adults with "early memory changes" who drank blueberry juice every day with a group of similar adults who didn't. After 12 weeks, those who drank the juice performed better on learning and recall tests.
The researchers wrote: "The findings of this preliminary study suggest that moderate-term blueberry supplementation can confer neurocognitive benefit ..."
And from this comes the headlines "Blueberry juice may boost memory," "Blueberry juice could halt memory loss," "Blueberry juice could stave off dementia."
Earlier research in rodents had suggested blueberries might have a positive effect on memory, but ... nine people? A 12-week study? It's a starting place for further research.
..."-----------------------
A nice little example of some of the BIG problems with how studies get reported in the news. Often there is no explanation of the type of study that is being reported, or how it might be different from other studies. The N doesn't affect how a study is reported, it seems. Meanwhile, people run around with the usual rants about how studies all contradict each other, when the reality is that the reporting of a single study doesn't do science justice.
As for me, I'll still eat blueberries every chance I get. Mmmmmmmmm.