Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A tidal wave of (autism) misinformation at WTAE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:00 PM
Original message
A tidal wave of (autism) misinformation at WTAE
http://autism-news-beat.com/archives/339

"“The numbers are staggering,” says WTAE reporter Michelle Wright as she kicks off the first of five news reports on autism. What’s truly staggering is how the Pittsburgh ABC affiliate news department could get the numbers so wrong.

“A few weeks ago, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new statistics showing that 1 in 110 children will be diagnosed with autism,” says Wright, trying hard to evoke anxiety and fear. “Ten years ago the numbers were one in 500. Fifteen years ago it was one in 10,000.”

Wrong.

The CDC, a source Wright has no problem quoting, found the rate of autism spectrum disorders among 8-year-old children in 2000 totaled 1 in 153. That’s not even close to 1:500.

As for an autism rate of 1:10,000, that’s a line of agit prop taken directly from a Feb., 2008 USA Today display ad paid for by nursing school drop out Jenny McCarthy and her comedian boyfriend, Jim Carrey. Epidemiologists, the ones who stayed in school and spend their careers in this field, tell us the rate of Kanner’s autism, generally regarded as the most severe form of the disorder, was about 5:10,000 40-50 years ago. If Wright was correct, then the rate of autism actually declined between 1980 and 1995. Except she isn’t.

..."


Read the whole story before replying, please.

-------------------


Ugh, is all I can say. Bad reporting. News as entertainment. Stupidity. Whatever it is, it's bad for Pittsburgh and for the everyone else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. I see the news does not get the scientific method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I get my scientific method by using magnets
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Putting the science on autism and vaccines aside, if you look at the controversy subjectively...
Jenny McCarthy looked much better naked before she started flapping her mouth about this on any talk show she can get herself on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. What is with the personal attacks?
If the writer had something important to say then they should have stuck to the facts, not bloviating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. But she really does look good naked. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AutismNewsBeat Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Autism Week at WTAE



I tried several times to contact someone at WTAE to respond. No one would. I've found in my experience that most news outlets won't hold themselves accountable to the same standards they hold everyone else.

Can you imagine what a sports story would sound like if the reporter was as poorly informed about athletics as TV "science reporters" are about science?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It should be amazing and shocking, but unfortunately it appears to be the status quo.
Thank you for trying.

Cheers!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvolveOrConvolve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. At the rate McCarthy thinks autism incidence is increasing
by the year 2050, 99% of children will be on the autism spectrum. It's ridiculous, but most Americans are too stupid and/or lazy to think logically and critically about the information they're receiving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-10-10 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. The allure of snake oil for parents of autistic children
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC