Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chickenpox Vaccine Drastically Cuts Hospitalizations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 01:38 PM
Original message
Chickenpox Vaccine Drastically Cuts Hospitalizations
http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20110102/vaccine_drastically-cuts-hospitalization-from-chicken-pox

"The chickenpox vaccine prevented more than 50,000 hospitalizations from 2000 to 2006, according to new data published in the February issue of Pediatrics.

This time frame is known as the one-dose chickenpox (varicella) vaccination era. In 2006, however, the CDC began recommending two doses of the vaccine.

“It is expected that the implementation of this recommendation will lead to additional declines in varicella incidence and hospitalization rates,” conclude study researchers led by Adriana S. Lopez, MHS, of the CDC, in Atlanta.

Before the vaccine was first licensed by the FDA in 1995, there were 11,000 people hospitalized with chickenpox each year and 100 people died as a result of the disease, according to the CDC.

..."



------------------------------------------


Sounds like good news to me, anyway...

Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why does anyone go to the hospital with chickenpox? I and my
sibs had it. My 3 children had it and none of us ended up in a hospital. Of course adults who did not have it as children often found themselves in the hospital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not all children are robust. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Okay. Didn't think of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No prob.
I usually stay out of the vaccine howling contests anyway, stumbled into one by accident once and learned my lesson. But that was a simple question, and the fact that we are not all alike gets too little attention.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good to know.
As is this.

"There had been some concern that vaccinating children may leave adults who had never had chickenpox vulnerable to more severe infections. This has not been borne out, the new study shows."

Hopefully adults will not be a factor in the years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. In other words, the study shows there is no concern, but you're concerned anyway.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Being "pro-safety" means always being concerned about what's shown to be safe, not with what's true.
...And I have the tangential references to prove it!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. So much for FORMALDEHYDE! FORMALDEHYDE! FORMALDEHYDE!
Now it's SAFETY! SAFETY! SAFETY!

Fear the safety!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's imperative that children be kept safe from vaccines!
Remember--Hannah Poling had an adverse reaction to vaccination which led to an aggravation of an underlying mitochondrial disorder, eventually leading to a global encephalopathy with features similar to autism!

Had she been kept safe from vaccines, she would have been able to contract measles, diphtheria, or pertussis like a normal child!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "Pro-vax nonsense" is rampant at DU.
It must be stopped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. ...and THEN develop encephalopathy from one of those diseases instead.
Damn those vaccines!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Her Mom replied to the brainwashing on this
here. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4420311&mesg_id=4426192

But don't let facts get in the way of what your religious leaders assert. It's fun watching you speak for the Poling family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Aside from the fact that it's impossible to verify that her mom actually posted that.
The Polings argued before the vaccine court that:
...the vaccination Hannah received on July 19, 2000 significantly aggravated an underlying mitochondrial disorder, which predisposed her to deficits in cellular energy metabolism which manifested as a regressive encephalopathy with features of an autism-spectrum disorder.
http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/CAMPBELL-SMITH.POLING041008.pdf

But we've been over this before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Wash. Rinse. Repeat. -eom-
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That was what the "respondent"
Edited on Fri Jan-14-11 01:16 PM by mzmolly
argued. I agree we can't verify it's her, but we can find statements from the family where they speak about the case and their child's autism as a result of vaccination. The rest is semantics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. FWIW: The respondent's argument was "here's what the petitioner says, we agree."
Recall that the petitioner was the Poling family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I think we have a chicken and egg argument between Offit and the Polings?
Edited on Fri Jan-14-11 01:42 PM by mzmolly
Regardless, vaccines + Hannah Poling = autism diagnosis. If the mtdna IS at issue, Polings father estimates 72,000 more like her based upon studies he's reviewed. Would you agree that we should try to identify people with like disorders prior to vaccination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Well, since that makes a 1:72000 incidence rate, why the hell not. n/t
Over a decade's worth of time and money has been spent investigating things with no basis in reality, so why not investigate something with at least a partial basis in reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. "The petition did “not contain a detailed account of the relevant vaccinations and the vaccinee’s
disorder."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Formaldehyde doesn't cause cancer if it's in a vaccine, and mercury doesn't
lead to brain damage. I know the drill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Odd.
It's not ok to mention that I know the repeats you offer by heart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. .
:rofl: <
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. Not concerned. Just have some questions. Given my first response
Edited on Sat Jan-15-11 11:15 AM by mzmolly
is gone. I'll ask them again.

Have most adults in the current population had chicken pox as a child?

How long does naturally acquired immunity last?

How long does c-px vaccine immunity last?

When the temporary vaccine induced immunity wears off, will the next adult population comply with ongoing booster recommendations? As you should know, 6% of adults comply with current pertussis booster recommendations. Do you feel we'll achieve better results with the chicken pox vaccine? If so, why?

Was vaccine status taken into account, creating a potential reporting bias in the science on hospitalizations?

You said these questions have been answered. I'm interested in seeing the answers. Please share with me where you were able to find them.

I tried to take off the big picture cap, and be supportive of this information initially. However, when I was characterized as "concerned," I thought I should expand on my initial (hopefully adults will not be a factor in the years to come) comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan 02nd 2025, 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Health Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC