What should be said when a RWer says about "Executive Privilege" and
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:25 AM
Original message |
What should be said when a RWer says about "Executive Privilege" and |
|
personnel not having to testify under oath or "on the record":
So, Bush has ordered them to lie? If you testify under oath, you swear to GOD that you will tell the truth ...
|
Throwing Stones
(730 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I like to throw their pro-wiretapping argument back in their face |
|
What do they have to hide?
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-11-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I have a question for the sanctimonious assholes relative to the subject |
|
Back in April or May both tony snow and dan bartlett said bush never talked to anyone in his administration about the attorney firings. So what conversations have to be privileged? Please right wing trash answer that question.
Executive Privilege is not a tool to be used by a criminal to cover his tracks. Especially one who leads the party of responsibility and integrity.
And why do conservative fear the fairness doctrine and swearing to tell the truth?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 06:19 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.