"Burden of proof" has little relevance ...
pudding man
(15 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-03-07 04:50 PM
Original message |
| "Burden of proof" has little relevance ... |
|
They accuse us of treason. We accuse them of various/sundry forms of criminality.
"Burden of proof" has little relevance in a Police State.
Did our bright and shiny Dem-majority congress recently unanimously hand GWB a new license to electronically spy on US citizens (possibly in violation of at least 1 court ruling)???
Did our erstwhile Congress give a fig or a fart for "Burden of proof"? Weren't we all "Guilty Until Proven Innocent"??
Puddin'
"Law without Equity is no law at all: 'tis a form of jungle rule,
and is always supported directly or indirectly by force of arms."
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread