The US Supreme Court now shows you what White justice is

[lxwen85]

Source: blogers

http://www.wliao.150m.com/
http://wanxialiao.wordpress.com/

Now finally it is the turn of the highest court, the Supreme Court of the United States, to show the true face of “American justice” – it used the same kind of unlawful and fraudulent means like that employed by the lower courts to deny my access to court by faking facts and law to refuse to file my petition.

On September 17, 2007, I sent a Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion to proceed in forma pauperis to the US Supreme Court (SCT). The court refused to file my petition and returned it to me on grounds “The petition is out-of-time.” The letter from the Clerk faked a “fact” that my petition was received by the Clerk’s Office on September 25, 2007, and reasoned that “the petition was due on or before September 23, 2007”.

1. My petition was received by the Clerk’s office of SCT on September 24, 2007, not on September 25, 2007. This is confirmed by Xpresspost USA of Canada Post that delivered the package for me.
2. By Rules of the Supreme Court, the last day of the 90 calendar days for me to file the petition was September 23, however, that was a Sunday. Then the deadline was the next Monday, which was September 24, 2007. This is because the Rule 30 of the Supreme Court stipulates:

“1. In the computation of any period of time prescribed or allowed by these Rules, by order of the Court, or by an applicable statute, the day of the act, event, or default from which the designated period begins to run is not included. The last day of the period shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, federal legal holiday listed in 5 U. S. C. § 6103, or day on which the Court building is closed by order of the Court or the Chief Justice, in which event the period shall extend until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, federal legal holiday, or day on which the Court building is closed.”

So the last day of this 90 day period shall be September 24, not September 23, and my petition arrived on time.

3. My petition was timely filed also because it was deposited in express mail, postage prepaid, and bears a postmark, showing that the document was mailed on September 18, 2007, which was before the last day of filing - September 24, 2007. By Rule 29 of the SCT, as long as a document is sent to the Clerk by first-class mail (including express or priority mail), postage prepaid, and bears a postmark, other than a commercial postage meter label, showing that the document was mailed on or before the last day for filing.

On October 12, 2007, I sent a letter to the clerk to clarify these facts. I sent the same letter again on October 19, 2007. Since there was no response to my letters, I called the clerk, Gail Johnson twice but all my messages were never returned. I re-sent my petition with a declaration of mailing to the SCT, but on November 27, it was returned to me again “for the reasons stated in prior correspondence from this office”.

Apparently, the issues that I presented in my petition are so significant in revealing the racist nature of the “justice” in US towards racial minorities, the Supreme Court of US prefers to hid its endorsement of all the injustice in this case, even by such shameful ways. This American justice system and this American government, from the very top to bottom, have no sense of decency in oppressing racial minorities by any means possible. When it comes to deal with racial minorities who are in conflict with the individual Whites, particularly those minorities who do not belong to a politically powerful group, even the highest court of US does not play by rules, and can do anything most indecent and despicable for their “white justice”.



Read more: http://www.wliao.150m.com

[msongs]

1. gee sounds like the entire human race is conspiring against you nt

[crikkett]

3. gee looks like you need more fiber in your diet nt

[lxwen85]

11. Reply to reply #1

It's not the entire human race, but the most powerful one, the White race that is in control of this world.

[MessiahRp]

2. What is your petition related to? (Layman's terms please!)

I can't understand all the legal jargon in here.

Rp

[leeroysphitz]

4. I just finished reading your Post. All i can say is

I want my 10 minutes back! (Yes I'm a slow reader)

[Infinite Hope]

5. They could have rejected it for dozens of reasons. They wouldn't resort to "time"

as a mere excuse to reject it when they have dozens of other reasons they could reject it.

[skygazer]

6. What color was your petition?

I'm having a hard time seeing where the supposed racism is in this. :eyes:

[BlueIris]

7. Yikers!

That is very diturbing indeed.

[Name removed]

8. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[pipoman]

9. It's you against the world...good luck with that...

[Igel]

10. My wife would like to be a published fiction writer.

She submits things to magazines and journals all the time.

She gets rejected with the same frequency that she submits things.

She keeps trying to take it personally, even though she knows she has no grounds for it. 99% of the places don't even read what she submits.

Same here. No Justice has seen your filing. Probably no senior clerk has read your filing.

In any event, your citing of Rule 29 is off-base. It's filed in a timely fashion "... if it is sent to the Clerk through the United States Postal Service by first-class mail
(including express or priority mail), postage prepaid, and
bears a postmark, other than a commercial postage meter
label, showing that the document was mailed on or before
the last day for filing...." You sent it by Canada Post. I think it's the postmark they're after--and they trust the USPS not to cheat, but don't trust commercial postage meters (which can be tampered with).

However, there's this: "... or if it is delivered on or before the
last day for filing to a third-party commercial carrier for
delivery to the Clerk within 3 calendar days." That assumes the common carrier provided evidence of the date it received the materials, otherwise some notarized form is required from you.

As for whether it arrived on 9/24 or 9/25: Did it arrive before COB on 9/24? I ask this because I've seen lots of things delivered late, after COB, even if people were still there to sign for it (and I've been grateful when folk I was a contractor for defined COB for their firm as "when I turn out the lights and lock the door.")

[lxwen85]

13. igil:

Don't tell me that it is Canada Post, not the US postal service that goes to the door of the US Supreme Court to deliver mails. It is the US Posteral Service that delivered my mail, you can find the tracking info on my documents delievery on the US Postal Service site. In fact, the Xposst USA postal service is jointly provided by US and Canada. The Rule says: "Filing in the Supreme Court means the actual receipt of documents by the Clerk; deposite in the United States mail, with first-class postage prepaid, on or before the final date allowed for ling;". So when my petition went into the postal office in Canada, its deposite is "filing" with the SCT.

Here is the news: I received a letter from Supreme Court after I sent a complaint to the Clerk of the Court William Suter, that says since the tracking record shows my petition was received by the Office of the Clerk at SCT on Sept. 24, not 25, my petition was filed timely and asked me to send it to them promptly. I have already done so. I know my petition would be denied for sure, but I need the confirmation and response from the other side.


The rulings at issue happened in US district court for the Northern District of California, ruled by Judge Claudia Wilken. The ruling resulted in the following:

1. A court may terminate claims of a litigant without any adjudication on their merits and even without ever addressing their merits. An endorsement of this by the SCT will be contrary to the principle of law in any modern society, and to Rule 54 of the federal courts that says:
“When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. In the absence of such determination and direction, any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties, and the order or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties.”

2. A judge has jurisdiction to dismiss an action with prejudice after the action has been already been voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by the complainant and the dismissal has already been filed by court pursuant to rules of the court. This is contrary to the stipulation of the Rules.

3. An act of forging a court summons, filing it in court and issuing it to a litigant by a court clerk within is in the clerk’s jurisdiction so that she is protected by quasi-judicial immunity to suit.

4. … (more, see my petition on my site)


When the US Supreme Court denies my petition, it will endorse all the above unlawful practice and so bring in a great deal of “constitutional complications”.

Now it is comprehensive why the highest court of the US would rather denying hearing of my petition on procedural grounds, even on a fraudulent one.

[jody]

12. Are you acting as your own attorney but without legal training? IMO that's rarely successful. n/t