As I read the enclosed linked article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/27/us/27detain.html?scp=5&sq=illegal%20immigration&st=cseI was bothered by the fourth paragraph:
In this mostly Latino city, hardly anyone had realized that in addition to detaining the accused drug dealers and mobsters everyone heard about,
the jail held hundreds of people charged with no crime — people caught in the nation’s crackdown on illegal immigration. Fewer still knew that Wyatt was a portal into an expanding network of other jails, bigger and more remote, all propelling detainees toward deportation with little chance to protest.
By definition,isn't
illegal immigration a crime?
This leads me to ask for help in understanding viewpoints that differ from mine:
1. What leads an individual to feel they are more entitled than the next individual who wishes to come to the United States? Why do they not have to go through the same legal process? (admittedly, this process needs vast improvements, but; it is what it is)
2. Why aren't more first generation (legal) immigrants (and those wishing to become citizens by trudging through the legal labyrinth) more upset and vocally outraged at those who have entered and remained in this country illegally? It's like I'm standing in line for 12 hours for a concert ticket to my favorite band when a group of people simply walk straight up to the ticket window and cut in line. (now multiply this example by 1,000+ to reach the magnitude of what would be my outrage)
Please don't address all the heart felt stories of those who came here to be with their families or who will be torn apart from their families. I'm sure there are many people with similar reasons who have and are currently trying to go through the system to become citizens. I honestly feel for their plight but they are no more special than the next applicant.