Wise Latinas, like wise white justices, have inherent biases.
...Chief Justice Roberts, who once said that a judge's job is to "call balls and strikes," like a baseball umpire. The implication is that, Roberts is unbiased since most people believe that umpires are impartial
So two separate teams of economists recently studied baseball umpires. And they learned something pretty startling: An umpire is more likely to call "strike" than "ball" when he's of the same race or ethnicity as the pitcher. And as a result, your team is more likely to win if the umpire is the same race as the pitcher.
And by comparing these umpires' calls with the pitch location data recorded by computers, researchers confirmed that it's the umpire making mistakes, favoring his own group. Similar research analyzing basketball referees also found that fewer fouls are called against white players when the refs are also white.
These three independent studies all find evidence of biased decision-making in a highly scrutinized arena with clear right and wrong answers. If our biases trip us up even when making simple decisions -- like calling ball or strike, foul or charge -- then I really worry about how they may affect the more complex judgments made by any Supreme Court justice.
Whether he admits it or not, a wise white man brings a different perspective to the bench, just as much as a wise Latina woman. Biases exists. Problems arise when we are unaware of them. If we acknowledge our bias, we can to work to override it. But by ignoring the reality, we will continue to tilt our calls towards those who look like us.
Inherent bias must be acknowledged