and even today many very liberal Democrats want to impose draconian gun laws.
The anti-RKBA movement peaked with the assault weapons ban in 1994. The anger that this law created as well as the interest in semi-automatic firearms that resulted led to a reversal of the direction that gun control was moving.
In that same time frame, "shall issue" concealed carry was sweeping across our nation like a tsunami.
Time and time again those who opposed concealed carry warned that any state that would allow such licenses would turn into the Wild West with shootouts at high noon and on every intersection. When this NEVER happened, the anti-RKBA groups lost much of their validity and influence.
The Republicans seized on RKBA as a wedge issue to bring voters to the polls. It proved a wise and successful tactic and won many close elections.
Today many Democrats in office support RKBA and get high ratings and endorsement from the NRA. The Republicans and Conservatives feel that the NRA has sold them out, but the NRA is a single issue organization and merely support those who support that issue.
I believe that we need to drop support for another assault weapons ban from our party platform. Our party has to move in a different direction and instead of trying to take or deny firearm ownership to honest people, focus instead on criminals and criminal gangs who illegally own and misuse firearms.
We then can take away another Republican wedge issue. WE can be the party that's tough on crime and criminals and the party that has the BEST solution to reducing violent crime in our nation.
Eventually Wisconsin will approve a concealed carry law and its citizens will no longer be second class.
Judge rules concealed carry ban unconstitutionalby WRN Contributor on October 14, 2010A Clark County judge says Wisconsin’s ban on carrying concealed weapons is unconstitutional. In the case, authorities charged a Sauk City man with carrying a concealed weapon, after he admitted he had a knife in his waistband. He never threatened anyone. In light of the landmark Supreme Court ruling in McDonald v. City of Chicago, attorney William Poss filed a motion to dismiss the case on constitutional grounds. Judge Jon Counsell obliged Wednesday, ruling the law is overly broad and violates both the Second and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution.
“The government has to have a compelling state interest to do so (restrict the right to carry) and they have to have the least restrictive means of doing that,” said Poss. “Public safety obviously is a state interest, but there’s all kinds of ways to do that in this regard.” In his decision, Counsell states the law forces citizens to “go unarmed (thus not able to act in self defense), violate the law or carry openly,” but notes displaying weapon’s openly isn’t a “realistic alternative.”
As of now, the decision only sets a precedent in Counsell’s court, but Poss expects the case will be appealed. “It’s ultimately going to get to either the Wisconsin Supreme Court and or the United States Supreme Court one way or another,” he predicted. The decision was disseminated around the state Wednesday, and Poss already had 50 congratulatory phone messages or e-mails from colleagues by Wednesday afternoon. “There’s a lot of interest in this obviously,” he said. “It’s not a left or right type of thing quite frankly. It’s a liberty thing.”
http://www.wrn.com/2010/10/county-judge-rules-concealed-carry-ban-unconstitutional/