Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fire expert criticizes investigation that led to execution (Cameron Todd Willingham)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 06:01 PM
Original message
Fire expert criticizes investigation that led to execution (Cameron Todd Willingham)
(CNN) -- His testimony delayed for more than a year, an arson expert Friday sharply criticized the investigation that led to the 2004 execution of a man convicted of killing his three daughters in a house fire.

Craig Beyler has written that the finding of arson at the heart of Cameron Todd Willingham's murder conviction "could not be sustained," either by modern science or by the standards of the day.

"The basics of (this) investigation is such that you could not come to the conclusion that there were arsons, they are undetermined," Beyler, a Maryland-based fire science expert, told the Texas Forensic Science Commission on Friday, according to CNN affiliate KVUE.

"By their acknowledgment, child fire setting, somebody else coming in and setting the fire, are things they acknowledge were not ruled out," said Beyler. "And in this case, they shoveled out the bedroom in the Willingham case before examining the electrical evidence, so you can't rule that out as a cause."

Full story: http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/01/07/texas.willingham.commission/index.html
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
freethought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anyone see "Frontline" on this case?
The documentary was called "Trial by Fire" and its focus was the murder conviction and execution of Cameron Todd Willingham. After seeing it myself, I came back with the impression that Willingham's conviction seemed to based on two things. First, many of the locals had a low opinion of him or outright hated the guy. Frontline did not paint a picture that he was some sort of angel, rather he was a creep and a bully. Second, one seemed to get the impression that the trial and conviction almost seemd to be a case of "Us vs. Them", "US" being the local police and fire investigator(s) and "Them" being the scientists and journalists that were sitting in ivory towers. One of the last comments that was made in documentary was the local fire investigator saying that he didn't care what the scientists said about the fire and it's possible origins, Willingham was guilty and that was that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah i watched that episode
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Justice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC