Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Am I the only one who thinks Black / White needs to go?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Race/Equality Donate to DU
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:22 PM
Original message
Am I the only one who thinks Black / White needs to go?
These terms were devised by separatists who wanted to accentuate differences. No one is "black" or "white" even the darkest or the lightest people.

We are all different shades of the same pigment.

African American is good term for American descendants for Africans, but can be misused. Not all African Americans are "Black" nor ar all Blacks in the US African Americans. Those US Citizens from Northern African states (Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria) and descendant from "White" South Africans can legitimately be refereed to as "African Americans".

I understand that many Americans of African Decent do not know the exact location of their origins as they were brought over as slaves. The same however goes for "Black" Jamaicans, Haitians, Cape Verdians, aDominicans, ect. All descendants of slaves brought to the islands by the British.

Do we really need to officially differentiate people by "race" anymore?

Thoughts for discussion.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Police find it useful
Same for male/female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Gender is hardly the same thing
While I can see that "Black Male" or "White female" is a lot easier than "Dark skinned male with short black curley hair" as oposed to say "light skinned male with black straight hair", They both say the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. We really don't need to but for some reason people feel the need to...
differentiate. We also do it with Chinese, Japanese, Indian, Hispanic yet there is no reason for it. Most times it makes no difference in what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well now
Chinese, Japanese, Indian are all Nationalities, but not races, and specifically denote where they are from. Hispanic is someone who is decendant from Spain.

That National line, however is now being blurred. For instance...there are now literally "Black Irish" people. African Immigrants to Ireland who's children grow up with Irish accents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I am talking about Chinese, Japanese etc.....
who live in this country and were even born here. I hear people say it all the time. The Chinese family down the street and so forth. I realize it's a nationality but I'm talking about Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Ah missunderstood.
But I think that, if used correctly, may be more accurate regarding their decent, but may or may not be accurate about their "race".



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
necklace Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-11-07 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Your nationality is what is stated in your passport
If you are born in this country, your nationality is American. Period. When you go abroad that is how we are viewed, regardless of one's race.

All this race/ethnicity crap is a mechanism to keep people divided. At the end of the day, we are all Americans, and we should begin to define ourselves as such. As Whoopi Goldberg once said, "I'm not an African-American; I'm an American!"

The sooner we recognize this, the sooner our race issue will begin to resolve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree...
We haven't even mentioned "the differences" with my so who is 5 and in Kindergarten - the ratio is about 50/50 and he has about two good friends he has made - one boy is white and the other is black. I'm hoping that it will be his generation that will become more color blind, more so than now. I think we still live in a culture of fear and hate - now it's gearing more toward religious affiliations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. 'White' and 'Black' are good because they make no cultural assumptions.
'White' and 'African-American' are not comparable terms. And many from the Caribbean and Latin America don't think of themselves as 'African' at all.

So, keep 'white' and 'black'. They're culturally neutral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hmmm culturally neutral?
How would you define the terms black and white?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. I like the idea of..
bringing back the term "people of color"...only this time it means all of us...cause we all have some color to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. For some reason "Dark people" has negative connotations
If so why does the tanning industry do so well? B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AtheistInBabylon Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Agreed
Totally agree with your original message Vincent. I think it would probably be the most effective way of defeating the problem as a whole. If we put much less stock in symbolically laden words and took them as value free instead, we probably wouldn´t feel so compelled to use them all the time. "That guy over there" or "that Eritrean girl at the office" works better than "He´s white" and "She´s black", merely because of the forced divide that black and white suggest. Better just to call people what they call themselves. Similarly, there´s nothing loaded about someone from Eritrea or, for that matter, Kentucky, unless of course one really is racist or prejudiced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Whether we want them to or not the terms will change; I see no need to accelerate the process.
Edited on Thu Feb-01-07 01:05 PM by Donald Ian Rankin
50 years ago the word most commonly used where we'd (at least if "we" means people in the UK) use "black" was "negro"; 150 years ago it was "nigger"; I think there was a period when "coloured" was; I believe that in America black is now being replaced by African-American.

Interestingly, so far as I know "white" has been standard usage more or less all along.

The terminology changes. I don't see any compelling reasons why one word is superior or inferior to another, except inasmuch as it causes offence. Unless "black" and "white" start causing offence, I see no need to change them, but I think it probable that they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-01-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. What is the purpose of the terminology?
Its original purpose was to divide. To accentuate differences. To catagorize for the purposes of discrimination.

People are not black nor white nor yellow nor red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think that's mistaken.
It's purpose is to enable to communication. People had different skin colours before they even had language.

I've heard the argument that "race is a social construct" several times; I think it's a foolish one based on wishful thinking rather than evidence.

Categorising things is *good*, because it enables you to discuss them. If you don't have words for something, you can't talk about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vincent_vega_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. black and white are colors
that don't exist in the human skin tone.

Race in terms of "color" is a social construct. Race in terms decendancy is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jcrew2001 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-04-07 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. america
Despite america's diversity and accepting immigrants from all countries, there has been an institutional culture of anti-miscegenation that has preserved racial lines between americans.

But with the growing influx of hispanic immigrants, there is a growing acceptance among the younger generation of inter-racial relationships and this will hopefully end the white/black class wars, but create one American race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Dean Martin Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-05-07 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't know
Edited on Mon Feb-05-07 09:19 PM by Dean Martin
I think it depends solely upon whether the people in question object to using the terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Race/Equality Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC