US lawmakers bring in worldwide censorship laws

[ilaughatrightwingers]

America can order any site in the world to take down content

The US government has decided that it has the right to take down content on any website in the world if a movie or recording studio complains about it.

The worldwide censorship programme will let the Justice Department seek US court orders against piracy websites anywhere in the world and shut them down through domain registration.
According to Wired the law has the backing of both republicans and democrats and is quite possibly the first time that the US has attempted to impose its quaint medieval legal system on the rest of the world. It is certainly the first time that the US has ordered other nation states to obey the will of its own private companies.

Basically the only reason that the world has to listen is that the US has control of the domain registration system.

The law is called "Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act," and as Wired points out it is the Holy Grail of intellectual-property enforcement.

If passed, the Justice Department could ask a federal court to for an injunction that would order a domain registrar or registry to stop resolving an infringing site's domain name, so that visitors to ThePirateBay.org, for example, would get a 404 error.

It is being pushed by Orin Hatch who is a Republican from Utah who claims that this world wide wibble thing is a tool for online thieves to sell counterfeit and pirated goods, making hundreds of millions of dollars off of stolen American intellectual property.

But whether the proposal would ever become law is unclear. For a start there will be a large number of foreign countries who will be leaning on the US to drop it. Wars have been fought for less and the world wide wibble is an important economic resource.

Hollywood has shown that it is quite prepared to blanket ban all filesharing sites on the basis that pirated material could be shared. A law like this would enable it to shut down internet access to any company which makes technology it does not approve of.

The fact that taxpayer money is being used to defend Hollywood against people who may not have any cash at all is another point. But the law could also be used to shut down Wikileaks on the basis that the material is copyrighted. The fact the site is hosted in foreign countries would not protect it.

The US has always been reluctant to give up its control of the internet, usually making the claim that it invented it. The fact that what it came up with is nothing like you see today does not matter to it. It now seems that US politicians are using it to prop up their entertainment industry's sick business model.

Our bet is that if the law is enacted then it will push other governments to set up a rival internet structure without the US. After all you can't have a system of taxation or legal repression without representation. Where have we heard that before?


Read more: http://www.techeye.net/internet/us-lawmakers-bring-in-worldwide-censorship-laws#ixzz10Hc2oOze

[FiveGoodMen]

1. Our government's only mission these days is to help the rich get richer

And that includes the military.

[Ozymanithrax]

2. Copyright and Intelectual property rights are not the same thing as censorship. n/t

[w4rma]

3. Good luck with that. Foreign nations don't like their sovereignty imposed on either. (nt)

[damntexdem]

4. There goes U.S. control of the domain registration system.

Or rather, the worldwide dominance of the system with U.S. control. It won't take other countries long to set up their own systems.

[Prophet 451]

5. Hate to say "told you so" but...

Couple of years back, the UN said that the thirteen root servers should be in international hands and I can distinctly remembers DUers getting up in arms. Phrases like "it's ours, we developed it" and "they should make their own" were thrown around. Well, shit like this is exactly why we wanted the root servers to be held internationally.