From yesterdays WSJ: "didn't rule out" wage base expansion
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 10:38 AM
Original message |
From yesterdays WSJ: "didn't rule out" wage base expansion |
|
from the Wall Street Journal's lead story yesterday about paying for the transition to personal/private accounts:
"Administration aides yesterday also didn't rule out expanding the amount of wages subject to the payroll tax."
|
REACTIVATED IN CT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 12:26 PM
Original message |
|
the most logical way to get more money into the SS system. Anyone who earns over $90,000 per year (current wage base max) should be able to afford to contribute more! Of course, the Admin. won't want to burden businesses with this additional tax (employers have to match employee contribution)so I'd be surprised if this goes thru
|
ribrepin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-04-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-04-05 11:51 PM by ribrepin
Employee continues to contribute to Social Security--no cap. Business is exempt after $90,000.
|
REACTIVATED IN CT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-05-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Is this a proposal currently on the table?
|
ribrepin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-06-05 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I don't think exempting employers over $90,000 is currently on the table |
|
Just my take on the problem. No reason someone making a million dollars a year shouldn't pay more, but business shouldn't be burdened with more taxes right now. It's an insurance program not a investment program.
I plan to write to my congress critters and suggest the idea.
|
REACTIVATED IN CT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the most logical way to get more money into the SS system. Anyone who earns over $90,000 per year (current wage base max) should be able to afford to contribute more! Of course, the Admin. won't want to burden businesses with this additional tax (employers have to match employee contribution)so I'd be surprised if this goes thru
|
REACTIVATED IN CT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-03-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-03-05 12:26 PM by REACTIVATED IN CT
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.