Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NOAA ANNOUNCES IMPROVED WEATHER FORECASTS ON THE HORIZON

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:55 PM
Original message
NOAA ANNOUNCES IMPROVED WEATHER FORECASTS ON THE HORIZON
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2005/s2491.htm

Aug. 24, 2005 — Scientists at the NOAA National Weather Service announced today a significant improvement in the weather and climate models that produce forecasts out to 15 days, which began this summer. More detailed atmospheric information is being produced at the NOAA Environmental Modeling Center, allowing public and private meteorologists to forecast with increasing accuracy. (Click image for larger view of NASA's Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder, or AIRS, Daily air temperature (F) 700 mb (millibar) for Aug. 23, 2005. Pressures of 700 mb correspond to 8,000 feet (2,000 m) above the surface. Image courtesy of NASA.)

The announcement follows major upgrades to the NOAA Global Forecast System, which is the primary model used to forecast weather patterns around the globe. The GFS is used in a variety of NOAA National Weather Service forecasts, including hurricanes, heavy precipitation, drought, snowstorms, icing and aviation. Now, the GFS incorporates improved physics of the atmosphere, a clearer representation of the Earth's terrain, enhanced satellite data from NASA's Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder, as well as other technical changes.

"Our nation will have longer-ranging alerts and forecasts through these improvements to the current system thanks to its more specific and higher resolution output," said retired Navy Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., Ph.D., undersecretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere and NOAA administrator. "These significant developments will have a huge impact on the economy and citizens’ quality of life locally and nationally."

The GFS produces forecasts of wind, temperature, humidity and air pressure for the atmosphere up to 35 miles above the Earth for one to 15 days. NOAA is currently working on additional ways to extract and use even more of NASA's AIRS data in NOAA's operational weather and climate forecast models.


Well, as long as we keep Santorum's filthy paws off of NOAA/NWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Such a successful government program must enrage tools like Santorum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That why he introduced The National Weather Services Duties Act of 2005.
The National Weather Services Duties Act of 2005, S. 786, has been read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Link:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:1:./temp/~c1090jKwBs::

Section (b) is the kicker:
(b) COMPETITION WITH PRIVATE SECTOR- The Secretary of Commerce shall not provide, or assist other entities in providing, a product or service (other than a product or service described in subsection (a)(1)) that is or could be provided by the private sector. . .


Accuweather is based in PA, and he wants a no compete clause. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I love the "or could" clause.
Aside from the fact that the entire premise is idiotic, he's basically saying that even if "service-X" is provided by the govt, and is not provided by the private sector, we still have to kill off the government service-X, because Whoa Nelly! the private sector could provide it!

Hell, the private sector could provide any service, in theory.

Of course, that's exactly the "principle" behind modern repubicanism. What was I thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC