Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Dead star' erupts for big show (BBC) {something for amateur astronomers}

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 08:11 PM
Original message
'Dead star' erupts for big show (BBC) {something for amateur astronomers}
By Jonathan Amos
BBC News science reporter, in Leicester

The white dwarf star in the Ophiuchus constellation has exhausted its own nuclear fuel but is now stealing it from a neighbouring giant.

Every 20 years or so, it gathers sufficient material to explode with enough intensity to be seen from Earth with the naked eye.

The so-called recurrent nova event has now flared up six times in 108 years.
***
Amateur stargazers in Japan were the first to report the nova on 12 February, and the professional scientific community has responded by calling up some of the world's leading facilities to take a look.
***
more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4885700.stm

Apparently, RS Ophiuchi, or RS Oph, should still be visible in small telescopes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Preening Fop Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hidden somewhere in rural Ontario, the stars are magnifcant....!
Thank You Eppur_Se_Mouva.

Because of their well written reports on a wide range of topics,
BBC World News and their talented Radio Stations
are highly valued on my 'Favourites List'.....!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyshkinCommaPrince Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. A long, long time ago
Which seems like "now" to us because we're just now receiving the light from the event. It always seems to me like the past tense should be used when writers describe such astronomical events. When we look out at the stars, we're seeing into the past. Personally, I think that's really cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. as an astronomer, I always neglect to mention this
When I study stars, I don't really think about the light travel time. There's absolutely no way to get information any faster than the limit placed by the speed of light, and it doesn't make a difference to me whether a star formed 400 years ago or right now; a few hundred years is meaningless on the hundred-thousand-year time scales important to star formation.

Still, that aspect of astronomy is important to non-specialists, and deserves more attention than it gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC