Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Native Americans Descended From A Single Ancestral Group, DNA Study Confirms (Science Daily)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:03 PM
Original message
Native Americans Descended From A Single Ancestral Group, DNA Study Confirms (Science Daily)
ScienceDaily (Apr. 29, 2009) — For two decades, researchers have been using a growing volume of genetic data to debate whether ancestors of Native Americans emigrated to the New World in one wave or successive waves, or from one ancestral Asian population or a number of different populations.

Now, after painstakingly comparing DNA samples from people in dozens of modern-day Native American and Eurasian groups, an international team of scientists thinks it can put the matter to rest: virtually without exception, the new evidence supports the single ancestral population theory.

“Our work provides strong evidence that, in general, Native Americans are more closely related to each other than to any other existing Asian populations, except those that live at the very edge of the Bering Strait,” said Kari Britt Schroeder, a lecturer at the University of California, Davis, and the first author on the paper describing the study.

“While earlier studies have already supported this conclusion, what’s different about our work is that it provides the first solid data that simply cannot be reconciled with multiple ancestral populations,” said Schroeder, who was a Ph.D. student in anthropology at the university when she did the research.

The study is published in the May issue of the journal Molecular Biology and Evolution.
***
more: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090428223836.htm

abstract of study (full article for subscribers): http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/gca?sendit=Get+All+Checked+Abstract%28s%29&gca=26%2F5%2F995

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. interesting!!! one intrepid (or desperate) group make the crossing
and populated a continent.

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. But I thought they were a lost tribe of Israel, riding horses and building invisible cities,
waiting for Jesus to stop in.

You mean the Mormons lied to me? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They lied to everybody else, too. Mainly themselves. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's about survivors, is there a possibility that other groups
did not survive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The odds suggest there musta been more than one group....but only one group made it to the Promised
Land
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Or other groups, perhaps, were simply out-competed...
...leaving no American descendants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. This study did not include the Maya or the Aztec?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Pretty sure the study included all natives from Alaska to Chile Southern Tip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I read that in the article, but "to the southern tip of Chile" could mean just
the coastal groups -- seems odd to me they didn't mention the Aztec descendants and Mayan descendants specifically if they were included in the study? I'd like to see their "Methods" section in the paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Why wouldn't they have been included?
Is there something you're trying to imply?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. No. Just wondering whether or not they were included.
Would like to see the article in full because I'm curious about how the study populations were chosen.

I don't understand enough about the hereditary passdown of "alleles" to imply anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. So much for the book of mormon
Jesus' relatives didn't emigrate here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. The first sentence isn't quite coherent.
"For two decades, researchers have been using a growing volume of genetic data to debate whether ancestors of Native Americans emigrated to the New World in one wave or successive waves, or from one ancestral Asian population or a number of different populations."

Could they distinguish between one wave of settlers from a single founding population in NE Asia or successive waves from the same founding population?

The abstract explicitly says the data don't distinguish between the two scenarios, however the science reporter claims the article crucially supports just the first option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. I would have expected
a greater degree of genetic influence from Polynesia into S. America, but maybe that's from more recent history.

Boy, this must have been one helluva giant playground for them to come to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC