Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Model Suggests Role of Low Vitamin D in Cancer Development

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 01:50 PM
Original message
New Model Suggests Role of Low Vitamin D in Cancer Development
http://www.physorg.com/news162183735.html

In studying the preventive effects of vitamin D, researchers at the Moores Cancer Center at the University of California, San Diego, have proposed a new model of cancer development that hinges on a loss of cancer cells' ability to stick together. The model, dubbed DINOMIT, differs substantially from the current model of cancer development, which suggests genetic mutations as the earliest driving forces behind cancer.

"The first event in cancer is loss of communication among cells due to, among other things, low vitamin D and calcium levels," said epidemiologist Cedric Garland, DrPH, professor of family and preventive medicine at the UC San Diego School of Medicine, who led the work. "In this new model, we propose that this loss may play a key role in cancer by disrupting the communication between cells that is essential to healthy cell turnover, allowing more aggressive cancer cells to take over."

Reporting online May 22, 2009 in the Annals of Epidemiology, Garland suggests that such cellular disruption could account for the earliest stages of many cancers. He said that previous theories linking vitamin D to certain cancers have been tested and confirmed in more than 200 epidemiological studies, and understanding of its physiological basis stems from more than 2,500 laboratory studies.

......................

Garland went on to explain that each letter in DINOMIT stands for a different phase of cancer development. "D" stands for disjunction, or loss of intercellular communication; "I," for initiation, where genetic mutations begin to play a role; "N" for natural selection of the fastest-reproducing cancer cells; "O" for overgrowth of cells; "M" for metastasis, when cancer cells migrate to other tissues, where cancer can kill; "I" refers to involution, and "T" for transition, both dormant states that may occur in cancer and potentially be driven by replacing vitamin D.

While there is not yet definitive scientific proof, Garland suggests that much of the evolutionary process in cancer could be arrested at the outset by maintaining vitamin D adequacy. "Vitamin D may halt the first stage of the cancer process by re-establishing intercellular junctions in malignancies having an intact vitamin D receptor," he said.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Correlation is not causation, but black men have a higher rate of prostate cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. don't be blowing sunshine up my ass now
er... on second thought, go ahead.

:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Correction: Correlation may or may not be causation. But in either case it IS correlation and, ergo,
not un-related. The question is exactly what the relationship is. If something that is corelated affects something else that is either the direct cause or more directly related to the cause(s) that is important information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Correlation can most certainly be unrelated. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Okay: It can be mearly co-incidental, but even a low co-relation can be related, just to relatively
rare instances of certain relationships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Correlation is not causation AND correlation is not non-causation.
Correlation can be suggestive of causation thus justifying further inquiry.
However, the model presented shows BOTH correlation, AND posits a plausible cellular/molecular mechanism for a causative link, which taken together is even more suggestive of causation, and thus more strongly justifies further inquiry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I meant to imply ythat while the higher rate of prostate cancer
in African Americans doesn't prove that Vitamin D prevents cancer, it certainly warrants further research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Ah, yes. I misunderstood. Thank you for clarifying. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aragorn Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. theory is not new
and may only relate to potential for metastasis. But there is a big hole in it - skin cancers, especially melanoma. Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Pure speculation here, but here's a hypothesis:
We know that the make-up of the light reaching the surface of the earth is dependent on the atmosphere. For example, ozone at high altitudes filters out UV light reaching the surface.

We also know that human activity has measurably changed the make-up of the atmosphere.

What if the wavelengths which naturally generate Vitamin D in humans have been partially filtered, and/or wavelengths that trigger cellular damage leading to cancers are now passing through?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. My GP (who is a well trained, tech savvy genius) just put me on Vitamin D.
Edited on Sat May-23-09 02:52 PM by onehandle
He says that recent studies have found a relationship between Vitamin D and long life in general.

My blood work said that I was low in D.

I do what he says.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yeah, I'm taking a calcium/D combo in liquid form and I do feel better when I'm on it.
Supposed to go for my "well-(old)-woman" blood work next week, so I will know more then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The River Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good To Know
Thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-23-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well the epidemiologists know the importance of Vitamin D
So much so that they are on a mission to increase the RDA. In the meantime, there is this:

http://www.grassrootshealth.net/

Scientists are calling for a standard vitamin D intake of 2000 IU/day and the achievement of a serum level of 40-60 ng/ml. Scientists' Call to Action.

GrassrootsHealth has launched a worldwide public health campaign to solve the vitamin D deficiency epidemic in a year through a focus on testing and education with all individuals spreading the word.

Everyone is invited to join in this campaign! Join Daction and test two times per year during a 5 year program to demonstrate the public health impact of this nutrient.


They obviously negotiated a discount price with a Vitamin D testing company, and are passing along the savings to the participants, as well as suggestions, etc., in exchange for tracking through a health questionnaire.

The advantages of Vitamin D3 levels being in the upper end of the range are shown in epidemiological results across a broad array of conditions, as demonstrated by this chart--

http://www.imminst.org/forum/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=6065

But this is the first time I have heard of this proposed mechanism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC