Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quantum Computer Measures Energy in Molecular Hydrogen

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:40 PM
Original message
Quantum Computer Measures Energy in Molecular Hydrogen
http://www.physorg.com/news182181821.html

Quantum Computer Measures Energy in Molecular Hydrogen
January 10, 2010 by Miranda Marquit Hydrogen Atom

(PhysOrg.com) -- When it comes to measuring the properties of molecules, scientists often rely on using approximation, since quantum mechanics cannot be exactly apply to complicated situations without the use of a quantum computer. In an effort to ensure that no natural behaviors are missed, and for other purposes, scientists around the world have been working on quantum computers for decades.

And one has been built -- and used to measure molecular hydrogen.

Scientists at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, and at Harvard University, in the U.S., have built a small quantum computer capable of handling calculations on groupings of atoms that are larger than previously used. The approach to molecular simulation is described in this week's issue of Nature Chemistry.

The University of Queensland offers this in a press release on the implications of the project:

<snip>

Here's the press release:
http://www.uq.edu.au/news/index.html?article=20368

Published: 07 January 2010

UQ’s quantum computers make light work of Harvard's chemistry

UQ physicists and Harvard chemists have teamed up to build a quantum computer that could have profound implications for wider science.

Professor Andrew White and colleagues from UQ's School of Mathematics and Physics, teamed up with researchers from Harvard University, led by Professor Alán Aspuru-Guzik, to tackle the problem of applying quantum mechanics to fields such as chemistry and biology.

“Physicists have a problem,” Professor White said.

“They have an outstandingly successful theory of nature at the small scale – quantum mechanics – but have been unable to apply it exactly to situations more complicated than, say, four or five atoms.

“But now we have done exactly that by building a small quantum computer and used it to calculate the precise energy of molecular hydrogen."

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder what the energy/time indeterminancy relationship does to this
Q Mech was decades ago for me, but IIRC energy and time have the same uncertainty relationship as position and momentum. So the more accurately they measure the atom's energy, the less accurately they know at what time they're measuring it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here comes the asymptote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. One of the statements here will come as a huge surprise to all of the world's molecular modelers.
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 09:14 PM by NNadir
Specifically it's this one:

“They have an outstandingly successful theory of nature at the small scale – quantum mechanics – but have been unable to apply it exactly to situations more complicated than, say, four or five atoms.


Maybe Professor White would like to be the one to tell Raold Hoffman that he should give his Nobel Prize back.

Hoffman seems like a wonderful guy, with a great sense of humor, a Gene Wilder kind of personality, at least to a casual observer. I'm sure he'd get a great laugh out of that one.

And someone should tell Howard Zimmerman to unwrite his book, now older than Amory Lovins' reports that "nuclear power is dead.":

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed054pA300.2

The hedge word is, I guess, "exactly," but it's trivial. People have been using self consistent fields and similar approaches, with great success, by the way, for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC