|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science |
Craftsman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 04:11 PM Original message |
Culled Out [The Administration could prohibit fishing in nation's waterways] |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Banning recreational fishing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 04:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-09-10 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted sub-thread |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-10-10 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. RW hoax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-10-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Well that's a relief! ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-10-10 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. Shouldn't you check the veracity of such an implausible attack on Obama before you post it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-10-10 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. Not surprised you posted it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wishlist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-10-10 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. The possible ban only involves bluefin tuna restrictions for good reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-12-10 06:40 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. And it's working. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-12-10 09:42 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Even the OP has mysteriously declined to address the revelation that he posted a RW hoax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
semillama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-15-10 01:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Well, could be shame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC