from
Why Evolution is True by Jerry A. Coyne:
http://jerrycoyne.uchicago.edu/about.html To read the blog, click
blog in the left sidebar.
One of my favorite cases of embryological evidence for evolution is the furry human fetus. We are famously known as "naked apes" because, unlike other primates, we don't have a thick coat of hair. But in fact for one brief period we do--as embryos. Around sixth months after conception, we become completely covered with a fine, downy coat of hair called lanugo. Lanugo is usually shed about a month before birth, when it's replaced by the more sparsely distributed hair with which we're born. ... Now, there's no need for a human embryo to have a transitory coat of hair. After all, it's a cozy 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit in the womb. Lanugo can be explained only as a remnant of our primate ancestry: fetal monkeys also develop a coat of hair at about the same stage of development. Their hair, however, doesn't fall out, but hangs on to become the adult coat. And, like humans, fetal whales also have lanugo, a remnant of when their ancestors lived on land.
Wiki:
The term atavism (derived from the Latin atavus, a great-grandfather's grandfather; more generally, an ancestor) denotes the tendency to revert to ancestral type. An atavism is an evolutionary throwback, such as traits reappearing which had disappeared generations ago. Atavisms occur because genes for previously existing phenotypical features are often preserved in DNA, even though the genes are not expressed in some or most of the organisms possessing them.
My new adoptive grandson, born almost a week ago, entered the world with baby "down," sometimes called lanugo. I wondered if this temporary body and facial fuzz that some human babies are born with, might be an atavism. (Apparently some biologists, including Jerry A. Coyne, think it is.) This led me to wonder about other unusual features some of us humans exhibit, such as extra nipples and so forth.
How are biologists able to distinguish an atavism from a non-atavistic mutation?