Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We know now Neanderthals were a different species, but didn't scientists used to think that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:37 PM
Original message
We know now Neanderthals were a different species, but didn't scientists used to think that

they were our ancestors?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, I believe the theory always was that they were an extinct branch of the
Edited on Wed Sep-15-10 12:41 PM by closeupready
human species. Sort of like Saber-Toothed Tigers are an extinct branch of felines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. generally speaking, no....
I say generally speaking because there was a time when relationships within Homo were more ambiguous than at present. However, as far as I'm aware the consensus has generally been that H. neanderthalensis (or H. sapians neanderthalensis, depending on your point of view) is a sister species or subspecies of H. sapians. That's certainly the way I learned it, back in the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurgedVoter Donating Member (753 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Neanders are not gone, they are just spread thin in the gene pool.
Edited on Wed Sep-15-10 12:52 PM by PurgedVoter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. You can still find them
working for Fox News.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qnr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. What ^--- they said .... Their points are the way I'd always understood it to be too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tea baggers
are direct descendants of the Neanderthal :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What an insult to the Neanderthals! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Neanderthals took care of the weak and infirm among them.
I think teabaggers have a preponderance of chimpanzee genes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. There is a lot of truth to that
Edited on Wed Sep-15-10 07:36 PM by chillspike
I think the Right unconsciously wants to turn us into a solitary species instead of the group species we are now. They want to rewrite thousands, even millions, of years of evolution and try to make us forget compassion and helping each other was how we evolved. The Right wants to put a price on every human interaction. Can anyone imagine our prehistoric ancestors charging for hunting lessons? Capitalism would demand that. Or requiring payment to help the other members of a tribe procure shelter? There was a time in our history when not everyone knew how to start a fire. Can you imagine if our ancestors charged other members of their tribe to build a fire? And if you couldn't pay, you'd freeze to death. We would have never risen out of the cave as a species if we started out with this Right Wing mindset that everything had to be bought and paid for to be good.

We are a group species, not a solitary species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Just like we do for college. We demand a high price for our
young men and women to get a higher education. If we valued humanity, we would all share the cost to educate as many as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chillspike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Exactly
We should use technology like the internet to make education accessible to all. And even if we can't educate everyone, we should at least promote self-sufficient living models so people can support themselves, at the basic minimum, without having to be a wage slave or be at the mercy of an employer.

If we could solve THAT, to me, that would solve a lot of modern conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Some of what you mentioned is just what the corporations want...

"I think the Right unconsciously wants to turn us into a solitary species instead of the group species we are now."

"The Right wants to put a price on every human interaction."

What a remarkable coincidence! :sarcasm:


"We would have never risen out of the cave as a species if we started out with this Right Wing mindset that everything had to be bought and paid for to be good."

Amen to that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. our dna is in excess of 99% in common -- and it looks like
that at sometime in the middle east the two groups did some schtuping.

asian and caucasion ancestory shows the most in common.

imagine the wedding parties and the those unions brought about -- oy -- and the bridezillas?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They didn't allow that
They said it undermined the traditional institution of marriage and forbid it to happen. They insisted that Rah never meant Sue and Gobagod to marry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Nova just had a program on how the Neanderthals had the speech gene
I watched some but not all of it.

But what I saw was rather fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Almost every culture has their giants in myth.
Nephilim. Titans. Grendel. Yeti. Musk Ape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think that was what they thought very early on
but I don't think it's been for many decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kind of...back when it was first discovered that they weren't just oddly shaped humans.
Once the evidence started coming in, it was realized that they were closely related but not ancestral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Did I miss something?
Wasn't it recently determined through DNA analysis that the Neandertals were simply a subspecies of H. sapiens? And that pretty much everyone who isn't African has up to three percent of their DNA from Neandertal ancestors during a brief period of interbreeding about 30,000 years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Not a subspecies, a close cousin. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC