Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Any other Amateur Telescope Makers here?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:33 PM
Original message
Any other Amateur Telescope Makers here?
Just curious? I think we are a dying breed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep
I ground a 6" reflector when I was a kid...last year I was going to give it another shot but I caved and bought a Celestron 8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Excellent!
I did a 4.25" RFT, a 6" F-8 and a 10" F-6 when I was a kid. We had a great Astronomy program here in the public schools here back then.

I am seriously considering getting back into it just to have a physical hobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Did you grind your own mirrors?
A 10" would be some good exercise--my 6" had a badly "turned" edge, probably because I was an impatient young rascal. Like to try it again sometime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes!
And grinding the 10" WAS exercise!

It was a 2.5" think cast pyrex mirror, and a matching tool. (We used like glass for tool and mirror and it helped avoid turned edges and other similar issues.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Astronomy and Space Science were just added to my schools class choices.
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 08:18 AM by Massacure
I tried to sign up for both, but only got Space Science. Astronomy conflicted with two many of my other classes.

Is grinding a mirror real hard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not hard at all!
There are a number of good books on the subject.

If you have patience, and can devote a week of evenings to it, you should be able to send your finished 6" mirror off to be aluminized by Sunday Evening.

Takes a sturdy workspace, lots of newspaper, water, abrasives, pitch, and glass.

You also need to buy or build a very simple knife-edge tester so that you can put the final figure on the mirror. Some math is also involved in that part of the process, though I did it by eye on my 4.25" mirror, and then found it was nearly perfect when I finally did the math.

Then you need some skill with tools to build a mounting and optical tube for the telescope.

You can actually make most of everything you will need, but parts can be bought in a number of places (many online). Plywood and pipe fittings have made many very nice telescopes, though. You substitute ingenuity for funds pretty easily in such a venture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I used to be
My childhood project was an 8" reflector. Several of us young nerds in 6th grade spent time walking around the setup with the main reflector in the middle, the grinding blank in one hand, and chewing gum in our mouths for when those chalkboard-squealing grades of carborundum were in use.

I wanted to make an electron telescope when I was in junior high, but it interfered with the time I had to dedicate to developing my early-adolescent psychosis. :)

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I wanted to make a laser then...
But my glass blowing skills were not up to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. I made a Dobsonian a couple of years ago under the auspices
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 12:00 AM by Gloria
of the local Astronomy Club....and then, James Dobson came a few months ago and I got it autographed!!

He's got long hair and he's around 80, if I recall correctly. He travels all over the world visiting astronomers and astronomy clubs and lecturing. And, I can tell you....he hates Bush!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Good to hear that!
I'd love to meet him. He revolutionized simple telescope design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. (Cue Homer Simpson voice)
Mmm ... a Dobsonian ...

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. There is also Amateur RADIO Telescopy
I've seen a few books about it but never followed up.

Essentially, an amateur radio telescope consists of an antenna, an amplifier, and (usually) a C-band receiver. A lot of them can also double as satellite broadcast receivers. Not the "DishTV" kinds of broadcasts, but the real deal from BBC, NHK, Deutsch Welle, RFI, and the rest, which also allows the owner to work TV QSL (a ham radio pursuit).

I also wonder if any amateurs are trying long baseline interferometric telescopy. This can be used with either optical or radio telescopes. The technique uses two or more telescopes with objective CCDs. The digitized images are processed together with the baseline geometry taken into consideration. Although the collected light isn't any better than the total size of the mirrors/lenses, the resolution power is ... astronomical.

--p!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC