Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Genetic Errors Nixed Penis Spines, Enlarged Our Brains

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:34 PM
Original message
Genetic Errors Nixed Penis Spines, Enlarged Our Brains
Genetic Errors Nixed Penis Spines, Enlarged Our Brains
By Dave Mosher March 9, 2011 | 2:44 pm | Categories: Evolution, Genetics

Geneticists have linked the physical appearance of humans to patches of DNA lost in the five million years since we shared a common ancestor with chimpanzees. One loss prevented men from growing penile barbs, which chimps possess. Another enlarged some regions of our brain.

“We can know what makes us human, what makes us physically different from other animals and why,” said developmental geneticist Gill Bejerano of Stanford University, an author of the March 10 study in Nature.

Bejerano’s team started by comparing the genomes of chimpanzees and macaque monkeys, which last shared a common ancestor 20 million years ago. They identified regions that hadn’t changed in chimps, then compared these to corresponding stretches of the human genome. They found more than 500 mutations known as deletions, or missing stretches of DNA, present in chimps but lost in humans.

Two deletions, one near a male hormone-signaling gene and another near a neural development gene, were especially intriguing. Tweaking those genes in mice suggested possible roles for the loss: eliminating penile spines and boosting cerebral cortex growth.

Bigger brains are an obvious advantage — “It probably helped us become the thinkers we are today,” Bejerano said — but it’s unclear why evolution weeded out the spines. These tiny, hair-like projections, found in male chimps and cats, can trigger female ovulation. They also increase sensitivity and remove existing sperm, ostensibly giving males a reproductive advantage. Bejerano suspects the spines are conducive to monogamy.

more
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/03/deletion-human-evolution/
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
d_r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. that has to be wrong
"Bejerano suspects the spines are conducive to monogamy."

No. Monogamy makes penile spines less necessary. Chimpanzees, especially bonobos, are notoriously randy. They have sex with each other any kind of way they can. Penile spines increase one male chimp's chances of winning the fertility bingo game and passing his genes on to a baby chimp by making it a little more likely the female will ovulate and by helping to remove the sperm of their competitors. Same thing for Tom cats. Humans not having them points to higher levels of monogamy for humans than for chimps. But we already know that by such things as proportion of the size of the testes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, i puzzled over that, too. The article has to be wrong. The penile spines encourage polygamy.
It basically says so in the same paragraph--that the spines help remove a previous male's sperm. I think it's just a typo. Writer meant to write "polygamy" (not "monogamy").
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. thank Darwin.
on the other hand -- there would be some very inventive flame wars here over penis spines -- i can well imagine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which is why we put out for every Tom, Dick and Harry.
Yes, as a matter of fact I do know I'm going to Hell for that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC