Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Physicists Apply Einstein's General Theory of Relativity to Superconducting Circuits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-11 06:37 AM
Original message
Physicists Apply Einstein's General Theory of Relativity to Superconducting Circuits
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110610094513.htm

ScienceDaily (June 9, 2011) — In recent years, UC Santa Barbara scientists showed that they could reproduce a basic superconductor using Einstein's general theory of relativity. Now, using the same theory, they have demonstrated that the Josephson junction could be reproduced. The results are explained in a recent issue of the journal Physical Review Letters.

The Josephson junction, a device that was first discovered by Brian David Josephson in the early 1960's, is a main ingredient in applications of superconductivity.

...

Horowitz said that he and his co-authors used tools from string theory to develop the gravity model of a superconductor. He explained that it was surprising to be able to link Einstein's general theory of relativity to a totally different area of physics. He said he hoped that the new tools would one day be able to shed light on new types of superconductors.

...

Horowitz and his research team found what could be called a gravitational model, or a gravitational dual -- a dual description of a superconductor using gravity, black holes, and all of the traditional ingredients of general relativity. "This came as quite a surprise because this is a totally different area of physics, which is now being connected to this condensed matter area," said Horowitz.

________________________________________________

Wow. If this one holds up, it looks like we may be a step closer to interconnecting relativity and quantum mechanics. I'm not wise enough to evaluate the claim myself, though I have always been suspicious of string theory because the mathematics always worked at a level several orders of magnitude below reliable observation. What do you think?

Refresh | +4 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-11 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm. K&R for you smart people who get this stuff...
Einstein suffered with math and the educational system and then comes through history as a mind ahead of it's time... Interconnecting relativity and quantum mechanics... http://www.awesomestories.com/assets/general-theory-of-relativity-einsteins-masterpiece-1
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-11 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Einstein said that the one most important principle guiding his development of general relativity ..
was that the equations should resemble those of electromagnetism.

So, isn't working backwards from relativity to EM just deconstruction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. FWIW: Quantum electrodynamics is relativistic.
Quantum theory doesn't work with general relativity, but QED works with special relativity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ah! Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. You don't need to understand a hammer to use one.
Admittedly, a good understanding lets you use the hammer WELL. Lets you use the right shaped hammer for the purpose to which it was designed, etc. But you can drive a nail just fine with most of them.

Perhaps string theory is similar. Perhaps we don't full understand it's repercussions. Perhaps we've got many of the details wrong, or the basis of it is all whacked up. However, if it provides tools that function, to a greater or lesser extent, it is still useful, at least until our knowledge improves.

Now, I have to go fix a leaking faucet with this ball-peen hammer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 06th 2025, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC