Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Only 3% of Evangelical Christians accept evolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:13 PM
Original message
Only 3% of Evangelical Christians accept evolution
Posted on: June 29, 2011 1:36 PM, by PZ Myers

he Pew Foundation has surveyed evangelical Christians on a variety of topics, and here's an interesting result: only 3% accept evolution. And it's worse than that, since that 3% seems to be just in the bounds of noise and the frequency of individuals who essentially reject the basics of Christianity.

To put the 3% figure in perspective, it is the same as the percentage of evangelicals who answered that it is not "essential to follow the teachings of Christ in one's personal and family life": pretty much the defining feature of evangelical Christianity. Furthermore, the 3% figure for support of evolution by evangelicals was consistent across all geographic regions.


http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/06/evangelical_christians_are_not.php
Refresh | +5 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
RandySF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Proof that part of the human race is not evolving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Proof that Evangelicals are either uneducated, or willfully ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. 97% of them ....
...evolved from the monkey that came down from the tree on its head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. I never heard that one before.
But I like it. I like it a lot.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Accepting that science can find answerw to lifes most intriguing questions...
is very different from accepting that those answere can only come from divine revelation.

So no one should be surprised at this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. When I was growing up, this wasn't the case. Christians were more intelligent, more well read
Then the ignorant branch of Christianity took over all of Christianity, and the rest is history.

My sister is a non-denominational Christian, and she's had to go from church to church, trying to find a church where knowledge was important. In church after church she felt the ostracism of the loudmouths who, spurred by the trend of the Christian anti-science movement, made pro-science Christians feel like outcasts, and even accused them of not really being Christian.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lord help the dumb asses
Charles Darwin .... deacon in the anglican church

Gregor Mendel ... the father of genetics who was a monk


********************

The fundies hate science

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. The question to ask them is....Could God use evolution in creating Man?
They have to answer yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Do the days of creation in Genesis mean actual 24 hour days?
Darrow got Bryan with that one in the Scopes Trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Old Testament should not be used as a history book or a land deed.
It has shown itself to be useful as a geographical map. Many of the Biblical cities and locations have been discovered recently with satellite imaging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Did they find the Garden of Eden yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Nope. I don't believe it ever existed. I am talking more along the lines
of the various non-major event cities mentioned in the Bible. Neta'im, Avaris, Dan, Jericho, Kedesh. The Bible mentions many cities, often in relationship to their location to other cities.

If you are waiting to find the Ark, Holy Grail or Ark of the Covenant I suggest renting Indiana Jones films.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Or Monty Python!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. And Gone With The Wind quite accurately describes Atlanta.
Not sure what that tells us other than that Mitchell had to place the action somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. god and evolution are competely incompatible.
Evolution explicitly rests on random mutation ie. completely free of conscious meddling. You can either believe in god, or accept the reality of evolution, but not both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. B.S. Gos can let evoltion do the heavy lifting. There is no conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. gos? evoltion? are you a teabagger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. I was rushed, I meant God. Sorry
I tea bag thee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. 41% think God has used evolution for the purpose of creating humans and other life
3% think human life has evolved solely by natural processes

And 47% say "humans have existed in their present form since the beginning of time"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder how many evangelical Christians have read the first book in the Old Testament ...
and noticed that there are two different creation stories in the first two chapters of Genesis. In the first chapter both man and woman are created on the sixth day.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%201:3%E2%80%932:4;&version=NIV;

In the second story, Adam was created first from dust then the garden was created followed by the animals and finally Eve was made from one of Adam's ribs.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%202:4%E2%80%932:25;&version=ESV;

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I've actually brought that up to some of them but they change the subject
or answer a question with a question. (Which is often done on DU incidentally).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. There are also two different stories about Noah and his Ark...
one of the difference is how many animals he took aboard.


The Two Flood Stories

A Comparison of the J and P Accounts


http://www.energion.com/rpp/flood.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. One of my in-laws says that if one part of the Bible is wrong then all of
it is wrong. It would not then be divinely inspired which is why it has to be seen as literally true in all of its parts. It's a sort of circular argument you can't break into with facts. It is just the case that people want others to think for them since they can't be bothered to think for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. This in law has the 1st edition
hand written in Aramaic on luxuriant Palestine vellum, of course.
The monstrosity your in law is quoting has been translated and revised for the convenience of despots for two thousand years.
It's become little more than instructions for being a perfect slave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
21. Those are the ones who aren't afraid to evolve. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. I often find the modifier "evangelical" to sometimes be confused with "fundamentalist" or...
"far right." I wonder how they are defining evangelical in this case. I'm afraid I'm unable to find the time to read the complete article at the moment. Off to the orthodontist. Please, oh, please tell me you'll be removing my kid's braces at the next appointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. In related news ...
Evolution has nothing to do with religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 07th 2025, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Science Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC