Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evolutionary Psychologists are Mysogenist pigs (that's a church, bytheway)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 02:02 AM
Original message
Evolutionary Psychologists are Mysogenist pigs (that's a church, bytheway)
Edited on Tue Jan-06-09 02:17 AM by Triana
Freepers LOVE it. (of course)

Google Satoshi Kanazawa, for instance for an example of what passes for scientific fact these days with the staunch mysogenist set. You'll find some rather shocking assertions by him which are based mostly on his opinion and the remainder on incomplete, poorly researched, ill-drawn conclusions - and part of those from a dead guy who co-authored his latest book. From the grave. Apparently.

He's the Ann Coulter/Rush Limbaugh/Howie Stern/Reverend Wright of The Church of Evolutionary Psychology. If you think radical Islam, Mormonism, or Scientology is bad, wait'll you get a load of the Church of Evolutionary Psychology.

Here's some 'take' on his trash "science":

http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/07/19/psychology_today/index.html
http://echidneofthesnakes.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html#8291138433810237995

And here's some of his trash "science" that I can hardly believe PT would publish over there - even though PT isn't a serious journal, still...the likes of Kanazawa is beneath even them.

http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200812/women-have-better-things-do-make-money-iii
http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200811/the-power-female-choice-fat-chicks-get-laid-more

He's the Freeper's Reverend Wright...and a walking example of (the lack of) evolution of certain human males. Still dragging those knuckles and beating women over the head with a club and dragging them around by their hair (or boobs, as it were...)
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. A certain type of person will always twist scientific jargon
to justify being a privileged boor.

This guy is no exception.

Take away his sense of masculine entitlement and there is nothing left of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. You should take a look at Sarah Hrdy for an alternative take on evolutionary psychology.
They're not all misogynistic troglodytes, (though too many of them are).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. I love this one....
"Similarly, men make more money than women do simply because they want to (and women have better things to do than make money)."

From "Women have better things to do than make money III"
By Satoshi Kanazawa on December 28, 2008 in The Scientific Fundamentalist

So women want to be poor and get paid 25% less for the same job. Obviously women just don't like money. Yeah right, tell that to Cindy McCain and Paris Hilton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's what I mean...this crap is his opinion - not science. It isn't based on anything
concrete - just assumptions garnered from vague evolutionary data (which can be interpreted multiple ways and from which he excludes pertinent facts to suit himself and his mysogenist attitudes) - and with the assumption that people haven't evolved or changed since.

It's pure horse-puckey. Of course his fellow mysogenists love it and that's how he sells his books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. I like evolutionary psychology

My own version. The one where the species survives by developing an innate sense of collective responsibility and constantly expanding the concept of the collective to and for which each member is responsible.

I also like my version of social Darwinism. The one that says that the more diverse a population is, the greater chance of success / survival it has.

I'll take a gander at your troglodyte. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-02-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. There are aspects of it that appeal to me, as well.
Reciprocal altruism, for one, as well as the switch to agriculture and villages over hunting and gathering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Sounds about as "scientific" as the explanation I saw many years ago
"explaining" the typical shape of the female body as having evolved "because it was more pleasing to the male." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. This thread needs an Evo Psych bingo card.
It's all you need when confronted with one of its adherents.



BTW, Psychology Today is enamored with junk science that upholds the patriarchy. Always has been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bwhahahaaaa! I love it...
..thank you. I'm sure I'll find a good use for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. "good luck"

Parting shot, was that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mossfryer Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. .
No, actually, i'm not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-01-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The Bingo Card always hurts their fee fees.
Must be the slot describing them as "undergrads who can't get laid".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ukonkivi Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-08-09 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Ah, oh wow. I feel like I can relate and if only I had things like that before
So many occasions things like this would have come in handy. I've had quite the bouts with these people and this thread makes me feel much better.

The only thing I take issue with this the "can't get laid" part.
It upholds their ideas of the "alpha male", men with money, ladder theory, and "women give sex to get love, men give love to get sex".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC