Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Are the Right’s Supposedly “Pro-Women” Groups Ignoring the Vitter Scandal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 11:41 AM
Original message
Why Are the Right’s Supposedly “Pro-Women” Groups Ignoring the Vitter Scandal?
In a nutshell, because they think that domestic violence is just a man asserting his God-given domination over women?

It’s tempting to think the biggest scandal facing Sen. David Vitter (R), the scandal-plagued Louisianan seeking re-election this year, would be the prostitutes he hired after running on a conservative “family values” platform. But the Brent Furer controversy is proving to be every bit as interesting.

To briefly recap, Furer is the aide Vitter kept on his taxpayer-financed payroll, despite Furer having held his ex-girlfriend hostage, threatening to kill her, and attacking her with a knife. The right-wing senator knew about this, and not only kept Furer on his staff, but tasked him with helping oversee women’s issues for the office. Making matters worse, Vitter seemed to lie about this last week.

Women’s groups and anti-domestic violence activists aren’t pleased with the developments.

snip

But what about conservative women’s groups? As organizations committed to gender equality grew in strength and influence years ago, conservatives pushed back with right-wing groups and leaders like Concerned Women for America and Phyllis Schlafly.

http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/07/12/why-are-the-rights-supposedly-pro-women-groups-ignoring-the-vitter-scandal
Refresh | +2 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because its one person and they are interested in the large issue
Edited on Mon Jul-12-10 11:43 AM by stray cat
because they can actually see the forest and not just a single tree branch that just needs cut off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Conservative "women's" groups are largely run by males
behind the scenes and stay on partisan message just as much as any other right wing front group does. The only thing that makes them "women's" groups is the intended target of the propaganda, issued by a few females they push out to front the group.

They're for women's rights the way Hitler was, pushing women back into their "natural" sphere of kinder, kuche, kirche.

Don't look to them for any leadership for anything but pushing the right wing agenda, in other words. The only real thing they have to do with women is the name they stole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because IOCWDDI
Edited on Mon Jul-12-10 11:49 AM by xxqqqzme
It Only Counts When Democrats Do It.

I'm certain you got the memo.

And what Warpy said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah! Where are those "mama grizzlies" Sarah Palin has been nattering about?
:evilgrin:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan 02nd 2025, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC