Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

what if you couldn't get contraceptives in some states?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 09:30 AM
Original message
what if you couldn't get contraceptives in some states?
What If You Couldn't Get Contraceptives In Some States?


Late Friday night, a last-minute Congressional deal averted a government shut-down, and did not include proposed cuts to Title X funding. This was much to the disappointment of Republicans who were adamantly pushing for an end to federal funding for Planned Parenthood, a women's health organization that does provide abortion services, but by law can't use federal money for these procedures. The Title X funds are used for family-planning services for low-income women, and slashing them out have been devastating for Planned Parenthood's ability to provide these crucial services.

As Robin Marty points out in a piece for RHRealityCheck, however, the battle may be far from over. The Wall Street Journal reported that in discussions, the GOP was pushing to turn TItle X into block grants for states, giving governors discretion in how they use the funds. This, Democrats argued, would be equally detrimental for Planned Parenthood, since it would allow conservative governors to direct funds elsewhere, leading, in effect, to states with family-planning clinics that could, theoretically, not provide contraceptives.

The vision that Robin sets out is bleak:

"There will no longer be a place for a women to get IUD's birth control pills, implants or shots that offer affordable alternatives or sliding scales. 'Pro-life' physicians will be on hand to tell you that the pill is an abortifacient and cannot be allowed in the center. And because the Catholic Bishops are still refusing to allow birth control to be a preventative drug that insurance will cover, most women will find the prices skyrocketing and the cost of preventing pregnancy astronomical."

We're not there yet. But given the states' recent attempts to restrict abortion and contraceptive access, it's clear that giving more power over women's bodies to state governors could be potentially catastrophic for access to family planning services - which Republicans in Congress and in the states are already intent on decimating.

http://www.care2.com/causes/womens-rights/blog/what-if-you-couldnt-get-contraceptives-in-some-states/

Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC