What would you say to someone who said...

[LoZoccolo]

...that there was "TOO LITTLE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE" between the two major candidates in the 2000 election? Would you be offended at the glossing over of the difference on reproductive freedoms?

[LisaM]

1. I would express dismay

at his or her low IQ, and suggest that they go to Sylvan Learning Center. Then, I would politely point out the difference between black and white, apples and oranges, and right and wrong.

[mojavekid]

3. ha ha!!

I needed that!

[Dr.Phool]

2. I'd tell them they were an uninformed nitwit.

If they actually took the time to quit watching Survivor and Big Brother, and research the candidates, they'd find a world of difference.

[Kathy in Cambridge]

4. Bush hadn't shown his true colors before the election; he seemed like

a moderate. The Dems were moving rightward. So I understand where the Nader supporters are coming from.

[Name removed]

5. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[LoZoccolo]

6. Fine, then SCOTUS justices are not a womens' issue I guess.

Sorry for this distraction.

[Name removed]

7. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[LoZoccolo]

8. Please don't bring up other threads in this one.

It's not what we're talking about.

[pocket]

9. SCOTUS? Roe v Wade?

Nah, those don't belong in here at all!

[Name removed]

10. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[LoZoccolo]

11. What are you talking about?

That's an unfair accusation, and against the rules.

[beam me up scottie]

12. I never said I could.

Now go and say what you just said in the women's issue forum, before I do it for you. You have ten minutes.

[LisaLynne]

13. Locking ...

This thread is being used to continue a discussion from another forum.