Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Being a Feminist Does Not Mean Backing All Women

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:21 PM
Original message
Why Being a Feminist Does Not Mean Backing All Women
AND I might add that being a Feminist does NOT mean "hating all men" - like some very insecure, self-righteous, stuck-in-the-60s extremely defensive (angry?) men assert here that it does - and who try to pull women into that argument about THEIR (mens') crusty, erroneous assumptions. Their insecurity and erroneous assumptions from yesteryear are THEIR issue. Let them wallow in it.
_ _ _ _

There is still a false idea out there that feminists back every woman, regardless of how she behaves. Let's leave that behind right along with 2006.

In fact, feminism is just the belief that all people have the full circle of human qualities combined in a unique way in each of us. The simplistic labels of "feminine" and "masculine" are mostly about what society wants us to do: submerge our unique humanity in care giving and reproducing if we're women, and trade our unique humanity for power if we're men.

So yes, I believe that women have the right to be wrong, with no double standard of criticism. But when we have the power to make a choice, we also have responsibility. Biology isn't destiny, and it isn't a free pass either.

Take the example of Condoleezza Rice. As George W. Bush's hired gun for foreign policy, she's been working for a guy who is opposed overwhelmingly by African American women and men voters, and by a majority of all women voters, too. Many white men are giving up on him too. Still, Rice could be given credit for sincerity in believing that Bush knows better what is good for the country than most people in it -- if she weren't so hypocritical.

When Rice was made provost of Stanford University, for example, she was the product of affirmative action. (I'm not saying she isn't smart; on the contrary, affirmative action often raises standards by enlarging the pool of talent.) The problem was that she pulled up the ladder behind her by opposing affirmative action for everybody else. When she benefited from Bush's support as well as his effort to attract some black voters by appointing a second African American secretary of state, she quickly became Bush's justifier and marketer instead of his advisor. Unlike her predecessor Colin Powell, she doesn't seem to have tried to mitigate disaster or given unwelcome advice about the consequences of failure in Iraq. Instead, she sugarcoated this illegal invasion in pretty public phrases about democracy, and became Bush's "yes" woman in inner circles, too.

MORE...

http://www.alternet.org/story/46621/
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-16-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I never backed someone who is not deserving of it.
I support women's causes. I was brought up to be more feminist than most my age. I don't feel someone like Rice deserves my support because she is a woman. Rice has been a koolaid drinking bushite. She shopped while people drowned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Same here...
...I had people mocking me when Lizzy Dole was running for Senate. "Oh! But she's a WOMAN! You mean you won't vote for her!?" (usually men said this but I even got it from a couple women). I won't vote for *anyone* who doesn't stand for, uphold, and promote my values - female, or not. Rice is despicable, IMO. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Atargatis Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Argh! Is that old canard still floating around out there?
I thought the whole ERA debate put to rest the idea of group-think or the assumption that being female automatically makes one a feminist.

Let's see, there's Phyllis Schlafly, Beverly Le Hay, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Bay Buchanan, Laura Bush, the bush twins, Condolizza Rice, Brittany Spears, and on and on. I can't see any of them embracing feminist ideals other than the right to have ones own checking account and credit card; and those are more capitalistic than purely feminist ideals.

There are a lot of self-hating-women-hating out there. Why on earth, would I support someone who projects their hatred of themselves on me because I have a uterus?!



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's still out there...
...that comment I got - was only a couple years ago! Sad but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course it doesn't
Like any political/social movement, feminism only backs those that agree with its goals and seeks to exclude those that oppose those goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC