Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone catch this interesting turn of a phrase on Olberman last night?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 08:24 AM
Original message
Did anyone catch this interesting turn of a phrase on Olberman last night?
During the story on the woman and young boy who were killed in Texas, Olberman cut to a reporter "on the ground" there and during his "report" he used the words "unborn 7-month old baby".

Apparently that's referring to the fact that the murdered woman was seven months pregnant. Guess it's just not good enough that she and her living son were murdered by this cowardly monster, the reporter had to get the idea in there that there's an additional crime in the death of the unborn child.

I have never heard an unborn baby referred to as a seven month old and it really threw me. Did anyone else even notice it? Is that part of the problem? Is even my use of the words "unborn child" or "unborn baby" contributing to the cause of the right-to-lifers?
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. So if you want to have a child and bring it to term
Edited on Wed Feb-23-05 08:31 AM by davepc
You're not allowed to refer to it as a baby or a child until it pops out of you?

I think these semantic games are silly. Most 7 month fetuses will be viable outside the womb with decent medical care.

I don't have a problem with abortion for the most part, but is it too much to ask that a woman make up her mind within 3 or 4 months of learning she's pregnant if she wants to bring the not-quite-yet-a-person to term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sweet Freedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. "is it too much to ask
that a woman make up her mind within 3 or 4 months of learning she's pregnant if she wants to bring the not-quite-yet-a-person to term?"

Many women do not know of any deformities or neural tube defects, etc. until they are tested during the 17th week of pregnancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
enkidu2 Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. so then
i am infact 9 months older than i thought i was? gosh and i had a birthday and no presents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah, that's what I have an issue with.
I'm not going to be 9 months older than I am now! Well, unless they reinstate the draft...

But seriously, we don't start counting the age of a person until they are born, so that is probably a new way to "frame" the debate from the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. These semantic games are not silly.
I know some states treat murder of a pregnant woman as a more heinous crime.

Additionally, language establishing the rights of children inside the womb are almost always used by anti-choice advocates and those who would appease them; this kind of talk is intended to gradually plant the idea that a fetus is a baby, from which the conclusion can be drawn that abortion is murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks tasteblind
I guess that's what I thought when I heard the phrase. I thought he was referring to another child at first and it took me a minute to realize he was actually referring to the fact that the woman was pregnant. Why wasn't her death and the death of her son heinous enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's a fetus until it's out of the womb
Edited on Wed Feb-23-05 08:30 AM by Kathy in Cambridge
end of story. But at 7 months it is a baby to the woman carrying, but scientifically it's a fetus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I agree that it's a "baby" at 7 months
because it is likely to be viable outside of the womb hence my choice of words. I couldn't call "it" an it or a fetus at seven months but I'm also not sure I could call "it" seven months old. It just struck me as a really odd description and one I had never heard (or noticed) before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Was he Chinese

Don't they start counting from conception ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yo-yo-ma Donating Member (185 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. it's a really common thing to say
even pro-choice OB/Gyns will find themselves saying "baby" when technically they mean fetus.

And it's hard not to feel that this life is indeed a "baby" for all the reasons mentioned above.

As for the insidious creep of anti-choice language -- more of a concern in legal definitions etc. -- I wouldn't read too much into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan 02nd 2025, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC