Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sexualization Of Girls In The Media Is Harmful

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:47 PM
Original message
Sexualization Of Girls In The Media Is Harmful
From Medical News Today

The American Psychological Association (APA) suggests that the proliferation of sexual images of girls and young women in the media is harming their self-image and development.

(snip)

The report suggests that the volume of sexualized images has increased as more media content exists over a wider range of accessible technologies, leading to increased exposure and pressure on young girls. Attitudes of family members and friends can also increase the pressure.

"We have ample evidence to conclude that sexualization has negative effects in a variety of domains, including cognitive functioning, physical and mental health, and healthy sexual development," said Dr Eileen Zurbriggen, Chair of the APA Task Force.

"The consequences of the sexualization of girls in media today are very real and are likely to be a negative influence on girls' healthy development," she said.

(snip)

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=63514
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. ahhhh, tell us, is sexualization of boys harmful too?
that is, is sexualization of children harmful no matter which sex they are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agreed, but boys, their clothes and the way they're depicted isn't as common. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. No it is not
I have both daughters and a son. I have never seen a boys toy commercial were the boy is getting ready to go out on a date or get anything relating to sex, macho GI Joe stuff but not that. On the other hand I saw a "Bratz" doll commercial were a girl about 10 was getting ready for a "date" make-up lined lips and high heel boots, the whole nine and not dress up stuff either the cloths including miniskirt and belly shirt fit well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The full report is linked as a pdf from the article I posted.
I recommend reading that. The scope of the report is exactly what the thread title states.

Logic would dictate that, hypothetically, if a mass cultural shift were to occur such that boys were sexualized in the media to the extent that girls currently are, that it would harm boys an equal amount, however, that hypothetical was not within the scope of the study. It does, however briefly address how sexualization of girls may harm boys and men (not by affecting their self-esteem, but rather by making them appreciate real women less).

The pdf highlights the extent to which girls are disproportionately sexualized in our culture. Data from some of the studies they cite (MUCH more in the pdf, read it if the subject interests you):

"In total (in a study of prime time tv episodes), the authors reported that approximately 78% of the harassment focused on demeaning terms for women or on the sexualization of their bodies."

"In the 182 (music) videos analyzed by Seidman (1992), 37% of women wore revealing clothing, compared with 4.2% of men."

"Kelly and Smith evaluated the 101 top-grossing G-rated films from 1990 to 2004. Of the over 4,000 characters in these films, 75% overall were male, 83% of characters in crowds were male, 83% of narrators were male, and 72% of speaking characters were male. In addition, there was little change from 1990 to 2004. This gross underrepresentation of women or girls in films with family-friendly content reflects a missed opportunity to present a broad spectrum of girls and women in roles that are nonsexualized."

"Fink and Kensicki (2002) explored the coverage of female athletes in Sports Illustrated (SI) and Sports Illustrated for Women (SIW) from 1997 to 1999.They found that only 10% of the photographs in SI during this 3-year period were of female athletes. Five percent of these photographs were “pornographic/sexually suggestive,” defined as women
dressed provocatively or photographed in such a way as to focus solely on sexual attributes (e.g., photograph framed on an athlete’s breasts). Only .2% of the photographs of men fell into this category. Sixty-six percent of the photographs of men showed them actively engaged in a sport versus 34% of the photographs of women."

"In their analysis of children appearing in advertisements drawn from five popular magazines (e.g., Ladies Home Journal, Newsweek) over a 40-year-period, O’Donohue, Gold and McKay (1997) found 38 ads (1.5%) that portrayed children in sexual ways. Moreover, 85% of these ads focused on girls, and this depiction of sexualized girls was found to increase significantly over time. In these ads, girls often appear with sexualized adult women and are posed in matching clothing or seductive poses."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Don't come in here and piss on threads
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. start a thread about it; this one is about girls n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. ahhhh, thats right the sexualization of girls is
completely separate from the sexualization of boys. The girls are dressing for other girls. Other girls are grabbing their tits. Thank goodness its only limited to girls....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I would recommend reading the study.
I think it will answer a lot of questions about what they mean by the sexualization of girls, and how it differs from the sexualization of boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. if you want to talk about the "sexualization of boys" START A THREAD ABOUT IT. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-27-07 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. lwfern has given two extremely polite replies to your antagonistic posts, suggesting that you read
the link and know what you're talking about, in this discussion.

Maybe check a dictionary for the definition of "disproportionate"

The approach you've taken will not be welcome in a forum that has too many antagonists already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, to see if it is healthy or not...
One need only look at that poor Ms. Spears. She might be rich, but at what price?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hard to say
Much is wrong in her life, I suspect, beyond her sexuality issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Stargazer99 Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I lay this at the feel of capitalism
Anything for a buck! And still the common man worships mammon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Try patriarchy instead
of which capitalism is a powerful subset
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC