Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"She got what she wanted..." says cop, who ejaculated on motorist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-26-07 11:48 PM
Original message
"She got what she wanted..." says cop, who ejaculated on motorist
....or so this guy thought. :mad:

Illegally Park-ed An Irvine cop ejaculates on a motorist but escapes criminal liability
By R. SCOTT MOXLEY
Thursday, February 8, 2007 - 3:00 pm

Officer Park: put your hands behind my back No one disputes that an on-duty Irvine police officer got an erection and ejaculated on a motorist during an early-morning traffic stop in Laguna Beach. The female driver reported it, DNA testing confirmed it and officer David Alex Park finally admitted it.

When the case went to trial, however, defense attorney Al Stokke argued that Park wasn’t responsible for making sticky all over the woman’s sweater. He insisted that she made the married patrolman make the mess—after all, she was on her way home from work as a dancer at Captain Cream Cabaret.

“She got what she wanted,” said Stokke. “She’s an overtly sexual person.”

A jury of one woman and 11 men—many white and in their 50s or 60s—agreed with Stokke. On Feb. 2, after a half-day of deliberations, they found Park not guilty of three felony charges that he’d used his badge to win sexual favors during the December 2004 traffic stop.

taken from:

http://www.ocweekly.com/news/news/illegally-park-ed/26661/

***note--I realize this is an old story. If it's already been discussed let me know, and I'll request this be deleted. Thanks. :)
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a prince of an officer.
Not to mention the jurors.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'll never hear the phrase "assume the position" in quite the same way after this
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 12:14 AM by Ken Burch
:puke: :puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke:

Dear...God....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Cop (with gun) ejaculates on woman while ON DUTY.
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 12:34 AM by lvx35
and the jury didn't see any problem here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not to mention he seemed to stalk her for months...
...waiting fot his "opportunity." But apparently that's her fault for working as a stripper. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Well as the defense attorney explained....
She aimed her slutty stripper mind control rays at him and rendered him incapable of functioning in his duty as a police officer. Amazingly, she was able to do this from a distance. She forced the poor man to disconnect his GPS and follow her out of his jurisdiction! Really, she's the one who should have been on trial, the hussy. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Of course...
...and the jury merely rewarded him for so aptly avoiding the temptation for as long as he did. Poor fellow. :sarcasm::eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. LOL!
:applause:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Words fail me
The poor widdle cop can't possibly be expected to control his urges with every female motorist that he stalks...Jesus christ on a pogo stick, what the fuck is WRONG with those people on the jury!

That defense attorney, Stokkes....:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Just when I start thinking...
...that Orange County may be improving on matters related to sexism, racism and gender--I happen upon something like this and it shows me, NOTHING has changed there. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think i know one of the attorneys on the case...
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 12:41 AM by Tom Joad
long ago, Jennifer Keller represented a group of antiwar protesters in Orange County, one of whom was yours truly (btw, she helped get us off the hook too). (wonder if she still does things like that?) She was one of those mentioned as being on the defense team.

This acquittal may not be one of her proudest moments. I can't judge her, a lawyer has to give best defense to people who we find contemptible too. I wonder though about the career line, from representing Catholic Worker (and others like me) doing a protest at a arms expo, to defending wealthy rapist cops.

It's the ex-cop that deserves the contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Damn, just damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. so working as a dancer makes you a sex toy for horny cops? the jury
oughta be sentenced to helping officer park drain his brain fluid next time he just can't help hisself. how can the judge let that verdict stand? last time i checked rape was still rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I don't think the judge can do much about the verdict.
While a judge can set aside a guilty verdict, he can't just decide that the defendant is guilty and overturn a not guilty verdict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ind4now Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. WOW!
I am usually the first to bring up how quickly people like to demonize cops and find them guilty of wrongdoing before any facts come out.

But holy cow! This guy was just wrong. I can't beleave he "got off."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FryLock3000 Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm speechless
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-22-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. I feel sick after reading that.
Really, really sick...

:mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC