So there are people off in a (DU) group calling me names because I think women should be cautious about the mercury that they and their offspring ingest due to studies that link mercury to autism.
They would have me shut up rather than speak out about a health menace that our gov’t has been complicit in covering up. They can go suck eggs :) .
Skeptic. They seem to wear the mantle proudly - but who is the skeptic here? The ones who believe whatever the FDA and EPA tell them or the ones who question it?
Let’s pretend for a moment that they are right and I am wrong. I don’t presume to know everything on this subject - but some of them do. But let’s just say that Thimerosal is totally safe (this has never been proven) and that there is a big conspiracy on the part of the right-wing fundies for people to rally around and insist there be no Thimerosal in vaccines ( I have never advocated children not take vaccines and the people who insist that are throwing up a strawman).
There are a lot of people on the right who have taken up the issue - and with their track record that in itself is a reason to wonder. Ok - so what could their reason for this be? It works against Pharmaceutical companies and it discredits the FDA and CDC credibility. What would their gain be in that? If there is a gain - I would suggest that it is that they would sound like people who are concerned about their children and those who are calling them nuts end up sounding like cold-hearted nutcases themselves. It costs $4. a vaccine to remove the Thimerosal from one vaccine - so those who oppose this sound like they are saying that a child is not worth $40. - the cost of taking Thimerosal out of all of their vaccines.
Another issue - the “skeptics” say that those of us who are concerned about this issue are not interested in science and in studies. There are different aspects to this - there is anecdotal evidence, absence of studies showing that Thimerosal is safe, studies that link mercury to autism and other studies that show there is not a direct link. Let’s look at those.
Anecdotal evidence. If children are being given a vaccine and there are cases and cases being reported that within days of receiving said vaccines (actually in some cases it was 9 vaccines in one day) the children lose their ability to communicate and to learn - just how many cases of this should happen before people say - whoa - this is a bad thing. One or two could be a fluke - but there were people screaming about 100’s or 1000’s of cases. What is the advantage of ignoring that?
At the time - if there were not ideas about a cause and people stopped taking vaccines altogether (maybe some did) - I could see how someone could be worried about the spread of disease around the general population. With people saying they thought that Thimerosal was the cause and now that it is removed (mostly) from vaccines - people should feel free to get vaccines now - their credibility is restored - so WHAT is the problem? I don’t see a problem. (And even if you think that there never was a problem - there is not a problem in removing thimerosal).
Burden of Proof. I think the burden of proof is on the Thimerosal manufacturer (Lilly) to show that the product is safe for consumption if it is going to be in flu shots (which it still is) and nasal spray - or any products that people ingest (It has also been removed from the market in the form of merthiolate years ago over health and safety concerns). Our country does not have that great of a track record on these things - I think it is reasonable to expect more. And in fact - the fact sheet on the product lists numerable severe and even fatal side effects.
Mercury & Autism. For a long time, some “skeptics” didn’t want to accept the mercury and autism connection at all. And it isn’t just autism. It is the autism spectrum disorder (ASD), pervasive developmental disorder (PDD), as well as other learning disorders and possibly ADD & ADHD. Mercury has also been linked to Alzheimers, heart and kidney problems and other things. But autism has been central to the debate because of the extreme rise in autism through the 80’s and 90’s. There are differing reports of what is going since - with some people saying it has started to decline since Thimerosal was removed and some not.
The argument - for those not familiar - is that children were given an increasing number of vaccines containing Thimerosal through the 80’s and 90’s including Hepatitis B at birth (even though it covers a disease affecting intravenous drug users and sexually promiscuous people). Also women were given injections of RhoGam (with Rh negative blood issues) with Thimerosal during as well as after pregnancy.
Autism is said to have gone from affecting about 1 in 50000 in 1950 to affecting 1 in 150 now. So it’s a big deal and people need answers.
You can watch a video of “How Mercury Causes Brain Neuron Degeneration” from the University of Calgary, Faulty of Medicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics (quacks, I’m sure :eyes: )
http://commons.ucalgary.ca/mercury/Mercury has been linked to autism through coal-fired plants. Autism rates are rising nationwide - not just in a few hotspots - although the Texas study also shows an increased level of autism in the vicinity of coal-fired plants.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0317-05.htmThis will show you where mercury is released near you:
http://www.nrdc.org/health/effects/mercury/states.aspMercury exposure - shows the range of products with mercury:
http://www.mercuryexposure.org/index.php?page_id=29What I get out of the mercury/autism connection - and this is what I’ve been saying - is that people should try to limit their mercury exposure. I don’t think it’s coming from just one source - Thimerosal. Some people focus on the mercury in amalgams (mercury fillings in teeth), some have focused more on vaccines, some on air and fish.
There have been arguments, and I think they are valid - that amalgams by themselves were not a problem, Thimerosal has been used since 1930 (although some point to that being followed by the beginning of autism) but may not be a problem by itself, people are supposed to be able to eat a certain amount of tuna a week, etc. But like what many point out and I agree with - it is the accumulation of all of the sources together that has not been taken account of. The mother who lives in the Ohio Valley who gets the mercury vapors from the air, eats tuna occasionally, has 10 mercury fillings, has a Rhogam shot with Thimerosal, the kids get vaccines with Thimerosal.... it’s all of it.
So why doesn’t everybody have autism? This is another so called argument of the “skeptics”. Some people have done studies that purportedly show that there is not a DIRECT link from (methyl) mercury to autism (or Thimerosal - ethyl mercury- to autism). But as I understand it - many of those studies did not take into account the genetic element. The glutathione study is one study that shows why mercury would affect just part of the population genetically - through lack of glutathione - a key detoxifying compound in cells.
http://www.foodconsumer.org/777/8/glutathione_autism.shtmlPeople who have Asperger’s (high-functioning autism - often associated with engineers and computer scientists because “Aspies” tend to gravitate toward those fields) - should consider that they may have low glutathione and may be more likely to have autistic children if their children are super-loaded up with mercury.
So - for the so-called “skeptics” (who aren’t skeptical enough IMO - insulting me over in one of those groups) you can see there is nothing to be sad (or pretentious) about. People are still getting vaccines. People may be more cautious about what their government is telling them is safe - more “skeptical” - not less. Plus maybe a few people will get involved in the coal-fired scrubber/EPA regulation issue - due to being more aware of the problems of mercury.
And when you have a child who gets suicidal about her inability to communicate - you get back to me about your sadness. M’kay? And one more thing - the right of Women to have a relatively mercury-free body to live in as well as bear children with (mercury affects the fetus the most) is an “actual right” and to say otherwise is beyond the boundaries of respectability.
:rant:
Some Previous threads:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1318974http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3387542http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3371733