Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Safer Beef - New York Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Environment & Energy » Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights Group Donate to DU
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:14 PM
Original message
Safer Beef - New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/13/opinion/13sat1.html?th=&emc=th&pagewanted=print

I dropped this link on the "biologist" for an opinion in tonight's daily thread from hell, and asked *politely* for his/her opinion. Still waiting :(

Here's a snip:

Fears of another case of mad cow disease in the United States have faded for the time being because tests on the most recent suspect animal came back negative. But that is no reason to feel confident about the American beef supply. American cows still eat food that can potentially infect them with mad cow disease. American meatpackers use dangerous methods that other countries ban. And the United States Department of Agriculture does not require enough testing to ensure that American beef is completely safe.

U.S.D.A. officials and spokesmen for the meatpacking industry argue that the public is protected by current safety procedures. The chance of human infection is indeed very low - but the disease that mad cow induces in human is always fatal, so extreme caution is warranted. The Agriculture Department is hamstrung by its dual and conflicting mission: to promote the nation's meat industry and to protect the consumer. It's clear which is winning.

In April, Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns suggested that the mad cow rules might even be relaxed to allow companies to sell some cows too sick to walk for use in human food. Instead of reacting to the confirmation of a case of mad cow in June by fixing the remaining loopholes in the system, Mr. Johanns announced that he had eaten beef for lunch.

Mad cow disease lurks in the animal's nervous system, and cows contract it by eating infected tissue. While cows are naturally herbivores, the beef industry turned them into cannibals by making meal ground from beef and beef bones a staple of the industrial cow's diet. In the wake of the British mad cow epidemic, the Food and Drug Administration banned beef and bone meal as cow feed.

cont'd at link.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. good to know they're following the British model
"Instead of reacting to the confirmation of a case of mad cow in June by fixing the remaining loopholes in the system, Mr. Johanns announced that he had eaten beef for lunch." In the UK some ag minister fed his kid a burger on tv to prove how safe the food supply was. Who knew US politicians could be out photo-opped?

I just can't wait to see how many cases of termial brain rot is takes to take the problem seriously here.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Unfortunately...
It can take a lot of work to tell terminal brain rot from the brain rot of the average citizen. It's on a continuum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. I also posted on this NYT article - here is the thread in GD:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4344424
Thread title: MAD COW: NY Times op/ed says US industrial Beef is NOT safe to eat

I'm a cell biologist and I can tell you that the USDA is most definitely putting protection of the Big Beef industry way, way ahead of real concerns for protecting the public from BSE or other diseases. This article states this and calls for a new agency to oversee these issues - but of couse, under the Bush Admnistration's Robber Baron policy, this would never happen.

We have to protect ourselves by being very careful in what we eat and not trusting the promises of safety made by the USDA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hi Hope !!!!
What a wonderful thread that is ! I gave ya a kick and a recommend this morning, because it's a very serious issue which is being very intelligently discussed. A DU rarity on this subject, believe me!

Thank you for the head's up. I also posted a link to the Organic Consumers org, which is an activist group that gives the USDA a very hard time :) And yes, OCA must be a threat to BushCo if Consumer Freedom has them in their sights....LOL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hey Catch! Thanks so much for your comments, recommendation and
links contributed to that thread. The situation is really serious with the New York Times comes right out and says that while boneless roasts and steaks are "probably" safe to eat, the foods most likely to appeal to children - hamburger, taco fillings, hot dogs - are not. Even if it is an op/ed, this is a very strong stance.

The beef industry will doubtless fight it, as they have fought all kinds of regulations and the truth in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Environment & Energy » Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC