|
My spouse runs a small publishing company from our home.
We have mid priced web hosting service - one that over the years has been beaten out in price by other, better web hosts.
We keep making the decision each September to stick with them as otherwise we lose our emails related to the business.
This December, he released a new product, that should have netted us IMMEDIATELY some $ 1,500 or more in sales.
But little trickled in. Local buyers of our books called us on our personal phone number to tell us that they were having trouble making payments, and doing downloads.
We investigated and we found out something disturbing - despite the cost of the web hosting service, when a customer places an order, it is more than likely they receive a security warning from their web security shield that the site they are ordering from isn't secure.
Upon further talking to the web hosting company, they said to simply tell customers to ignore these messages. They explained that the reason for these messages is that we never had paid an extra $ 200 for our customers' purchases to have a separate certificate from our firm and that without that separate certificate, our firm is "sharing" security certificates with other firms - and thus is detected by customers' users as being insecure. They seemed unconcerned about the trouble this has cost us - and quite insistent that their method of letting companies "share" security certificates was no big deal.
So I am very angry right now. First of all, why didn't the company make this clear to us years ago? Second of all, why should we pay more to have a security certificate that is not shared? My web hosting service which is cheaper than the spouse's, does this for me for much less than the fee we are already paying for his web hosting service.
I have no idea how much money we have lost to date over this.
What do you think?
|