"In all cases for dogs and cats, except for cats going to the vet, children adversely affected the

[BrklynLiberal]

animals"

http://www.livescience.com/animals/babies-steal-dogs-spotlight-100815.html
Animals
Newborn Babies Steal Pets' Spotlight

By Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer

posted: 15 August 2010 02:52 pm ET

Move over, Fluffy. Baby's on the way.

Pet owners often swear that a new baby won't change how they feel about their cat or dog. But a new study of pet owners in Indiana finds that parenthood does affect the way people think about and treat their domesticated furballs.

The study involved survey questions about how much time people spent with their animals, what they did together, and how often the pets got medical care. The last question was a proxy for how well the animals were cared for.

"In all cases for dogs and cats, except for cats going to the vet, children adversely affected the animals," study researcher David Blouin, a cultural sociologist at Indiana University South Bend, told LiveScience. "People with children spent less time with their animals and took them to the vet less often."

That's not to say that parents neglected or mistreated their pets. It just turns out that the way we view our pets depends a lot on our social context, Blouin said.

Pet Nation

Pet ownership is incredibly common in America, with over 60 percent of households claiming at least one pet. The way people interact with their pets has also shifted over time, Blouin said, which made him wonder what other factors make a difference in how people see their relationships with a pet.

To investigate, he mailed surveys to 1,900 dog and cat owners in Indiana.

Almost 600 people, 307 dog owners and 271 cat owners, responded. The results, presented Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, showed that, for the most part, people really love their pets. Almost 93 percent of dog owners and 77 percent of cat owners took their animals to yearly veterinarian appointments. Fewer than 1 percent of dog owners and 4 percent of cat owners admitted to never taking their animals to the vet.

Pet owners also reported spending lots of time with their animals. Over 80 percent of dog owners and 67 percent of cat owners said they spent more than two hours a day interacting with their pet. All but a few percent of people spent at least some time with their pets each day.

Defining the relationship

To find out more about how people felt about their pets, Blouin arranged in-depth interviews with 35 dog owners. He found that people reported intense emotional attachments to their dogs; often, the dogs would sit on the owner's lap throughout the interview.

"It was moving at times to see how attached people were and how much they did get from their relationships," Blouin said.

Blouin's previous research has found three types of pet owners: Dominionists, who are fond of their pets but view them primarily as useful animals, not companions; Humanists, who see their pets as practically human; and Protectionists, who see animals as separate beings that humans have a responsibility to help and protect. The last group includes many people who take in foster pets or volunteer to care for abandoned animals.

He found that people who live in rural areas tend to hold more Dominionist attitudes, while those in cities are slightly more likely to hold a Humanist view. He also found that people with children reported that their attitudes changed with the birth of their child. Before the birth, he said, people reported feeling like their pet was their child. After having a kid, they were less likely to hold that attitude.

The findings could explain, in part, why people with kids spent less time with their pets, Blouin said.

"Part of it is time and money, perhaps just not having the resources," he said. "But also part of it is about definition."

Fortunately for fluffy companions everywhere, this less-sentimental view toward pets tends to shift back after the children grow up. Empty nesters often reported that relationships with their pets were stronger after the children left the house.

[undeterred]

1. I wish I could get parents to see the insanity of bringing

their young children along to the dog park. Sure, it kills two birds with one stone, but its not safe.

I've seen parents set down a baby carrier holding a 5 month old infant on the ground in the dog park. If they're very lucky the dogs will ignore it. If my dog comes along the infant will get a big doggie kiss. But what if a dog comes along who isn't so friendly?

There is a sign that says NO STROLLERS and CHILDREN OVER 8 ARE WELCOME. But nearly every day I see strollers with 2 year olds at the dog park.

Much safer to take the dog and the baby on a walk in the neighborhood than in the dog park.

:rant:

[BrklynLiberal]

2. It is horrifying and in some cases, sickening, to see the stupidity and

carelessness that some people treat their children..as well as their pets.

I wish I had $10 right now for every time I have seen as parent, talking on their cell phone, pushing a baby stroller/carriage in front of them into the street without really looking to see what the traffic situation is.

[Warpy]

3. One of the funniest things I ever saw was when friends brought

the new baby home and set the carrier on a coffee table. The clowder all came over to sniff and find out what it was. The baby moved and they all took off in separate directions, horrified.

I always saw those cats getting lap time. There might have been less of it from my friends, but everybody who visited loved cats (or they'd never get out alive) and everybody's lap was fair game.