|
Edited on Tue Dec-07-04 12:04 AM by crispini
I was heavily involved in Dallas for Kerry. TONS of work. We were totally grassroots, nothing at all from national, but that was OK, we did it on our own. I was also somewhat involved with DFA. I totally sat out the primaries.... I was not a Deaniac, I was a Clarkie, but I went to the wonderful DFA and 21st century dems training down in Austin, and I learned so much and was so happy and thrilled that someone was giving me the training that our local DP had not. and I went to some of the local DFA meetups.
Our local DFA mostly did meetups and connected people with campaigns. Dallas for Kerry did blockwalks, phonebanking, events, a shitload of stuff.
Now that the campaign is over, IMO, we have two local groups with the same mission. DFA has the advantage of support and help from a national organization. DFK obviously does not. DFK is reinventing itself, and I am urging that we merge with DFA. Locally, the DFA organization does not have a strong, established culture. There are much fewer of them than there are of DFK activists. For all practical purposes, if this were to occur, what would happen is that DFK would take over DFA, and the culture in the organization would be Dallas for Kerry's, because 90% of the membership and leadership would ours.
The DFA members are neutral, or don't seem to mind, -- have discussed it with members and one of the leaders and he has discussed it with the other leaders -- and the DFK members, a lot of them, are really fighting it.
I am completely floored by this. What I am hearing is that people don't WANT to feel like they are getting "direction" from a national organization, and also essentially what I am hearing is that people are not interested in this because of Howard Dean. That really interests me. I mean, we're all just Democrats together, right? We are all very interested taking back our country. I guess what I'm really wondering is, why can't we all get along?
What is going on here? Can someone explain it to me? I know that Dean is perceived as more leftwing than a lot of the other primary candidiates are, but why should his POLICY positions make a diff to an organiziation which is mostly GRASSROOTS based, interested in ORGANIZING.
I just percieve DFA as a practical way to get things done. I want everyone to play and share nicely together.
Can someone who has been around the block a few more times than I explain it to me?
Edited to add:
I read some of other threads and it seems there is stuff going on on this board I don't know about re: Dean? I'm sorry, I have been very involved with local politics and the voter fraud issue. Please let me assure you this is not flamebait, if you know Fudge Stripe Cookays she can vouch for me.
|