Palden Jenkins: The Next Seventy Years
Anyone ever read this guy's articles? He's done some pretty long-range astrological forecasts on the 21st century and the basic, overall social/political/global trends we might anticipate in the coming decades. In a nutshell, based upon past trends, we seem to be entering the ramping up phase of a major "transition/testing period" that will be the focus of the next 10 years. It's by no means hard to see from here, given the current decaying state of democracy and economics within the US, and how those collapses are likely to play out on a global level. We are also facing big problems with energy (oil in particular) and global warming very soon, if not already.
According to Jenkins, we may survive the 2010s only to face
the mother of all turning points for humanity in the 2040s, in which we face massive, revolutionary breakthrough, or a total, if not
final breakdown of humanity.
Sounds scary enough for me. But I am also intrigued.
Note to Mods: The following are three separate articles. I separated them by links and lines at the end of every four paragraphs (four from each article). For astrologers, the last two article excerpts contain aspects.
Take a look...
--
--
Palden Jenkins
Healing the Hurts of Nations
The extent of underlying world need for apocalypse, for a global, soul-educational breakthrough, changes with every moment. We are regularly making historically-impacting decisions, some of which are deeply decisive and some of which crucially affect underlying trends, and the trajectory of history changes thereby. Humanity has demonstrated in some instances a mysterious capacity to make last-minute redemptive decisions: it's called '
forgive and forget', and '
let's get on with it'. Even the urge for 'business as usual' can occasionally be redemptive - it helps us make new sense of rapidly-changing situations. It can even stop otherwise-unstoppable wars.
However, the steady pattern visible across recent centuries is one of refusal to embrace fundamental change. We have had much technological, economic and cultural change, yet these have consistently led to an increasing spiritual impoverishment. Changes we have seen in the 19th and 20th centuries have mainly consisted of approximate extrapolations of the same unfolding logic of civilisation - based on materialism, acquisitiveness, exploitation and short-sight. Major historic changes we have made in the last century do not guarantee human survival - the UN Charter of Human Rights, the invention of the microchip or even the Earth Summit have been laudable attempts, though these do not constitute fundamental shifts of agenda, only refinements of the previous agenda's rougher edges. Our resistance to fundamental change is such that we refuse to make changes even when we know we need to.
Our window of opportunity for planning an orderly world transition opened in the 1960s. However, in recent decades we have invested ever-increasingly in
avoiding 'the Big One' - we bought into the glitz of the free-trade, economic growth-based lottery show, and many now quietly regret it. Thus, excepting possible surprises, we are heading for a full-scale whammy of an apocalypse. In our unconscious behaviour as a planetary race, we are asking for it. "
Give us the Big One, so that we may learn - since we cannot learn ourselves". It's an obsessive-compulsive suicidal transformation-urge.
The 'Big One' could imply a single crux-moment, or it could imply a period of perhaps decades in which the symptoms of apocalypse unfold though a series of waves of intensity. Whichever, we are talking not of an ordered, planned change of direction for the human race, but rather of
a change in the nature of order itself.
Much, much more --
http://www.palden.co.uk/hhn/essays/hhn-40.html--
--
The Nature of Our Times, part 2
--snip--
The first decade of the 2000s is likely involve getting on with the situation at hand, integrating changes made so far and moving things forward. Probable rapid progress of events and trends. From late 2006-2010 comes a series of Saturn aspects: oppositions to Neptune (2006-7, Leo-Aquarius) and Uranus (2008-10, Virgo-Pisces), and a square to Pluto (2009-10, Libra-Capricorn). These will present viability-challenges, forcing manifest solutions and possibly causing considerable hardship or confrontation with factual realities.
The sequence might bring dislocations of power in 2006-7 and transition and healing in 2008-10, with much reorganisation and crunchy grating added. (NB: Could this represent the fall of the Bush regime?) This is a likely shock period, partially disappointing and partially catalysing concrete actions and policy-changes for later benefit.
2009 sees Uranus semisextile (30°) Neptune, promising the emergence of definite developments arising out of 1993, plus a melting of barriers to change. Then comes action.
In 2012-15, Uranus forms a square (90°) to Pluto (Aries to Capricorn). This is the opening square after the conjunction of 1965-66 – a major test of what was seeded over 45 years before. This suggests a Big Problem – but if there is the will to confront it positively, it promises great breakthrough. This could be an exceptionally trying time, a material test of our ability to overcome massive hurdles. Technical and organisational implications are involved, and many new factors will jump in – it's a time of potential shock.
The innovations and ideas of the 1960s (microchips to therapies) will either come to work now, or will fail to carry the day. It's a time of emergency and crisis – the edge. It will demand much effort and definite results or big adjustments to new, shocking realities. This could also bring a major setback which, in the longterm (by the 2040s) could bring great benefit. Be it setback or breakthrough, the issues will hang around questions of force, science and technology, resources, land, finance, warfare – and more about institutions. There could be rebellion too. This is a decisive turning-point. Not easy.
In 2017-19 we see a Uranus semisquare (45°) Neptune (Aries to Pisces), a heady time, in which ideational and perceptual changes will affect how we experience things. Major attitudinal shifts. Religious, moral and creative matters could be prominent. In 2020, both Saturn and Jupiter conjunct Pluto in Capricorn, affecting governments, land, economy and law – in fact, the whole period of 1984-2020 concerns organisational structures in various ways. This could be an important time for the start of a new world institution, or for major legislation. Something of a social-political crisis, dealing with 'delivering the goods'.
Much more --
http://www.palden.co.uk/palden/pal-4tin.html--
--
The Next Seventy Years
...In 2012-16 we face a crunch. All that was seen and conceived in the mid-1960s will be fully under test – plus the beliefs and efforts of the generation which was deeply marked by the 1960s. Rising difficulties will force pragmatic adaptation. There will be more emphasis on structures, but particularly on the capacity of structures to handle and channel change, forced by crisis. The time for debates will be over, and the world will be faced with many imperatives – possibly even a world crisis of enormous proportions. Energy straining against containment: Uranus in Aries square (90°) Pluto in Capricorn. Choices and re-adjustments, stress between individual and society. Cooperation or breakdown. A major transition or painful ruin – or a mixture of both, depending on our choices.
The period of 2025-31 promises to be exciting, if we progress through the preceding phase: a rapid unfoldment of forward-moving events and developments, immense swings of the balance, times of genius, motion, mingling, activity and momentum. Possibly great progress in unravelling a future culture and world civilisation: Uranus in Gemini, Neptune in Aries, Pluto in Aquarius, in a triangle. Children of the 1980s and 1990s will be in power. Great potential forwardness. Either this, or if we fared badly around 2012-16, a long drudgerous experiencing of the outcomes of what happened. Yet things are not yet likely to be resolved: the 2030s will probably be acute, an ongoing knife-edge, with no ease or let-up, yet potentially there can be a great healing, decontamination and reconstruction going on. We'll have to work hard though.
Then come the 2040s, a big time of testing. By now, humanity will have to be united enough and sufficiently in unison to handle things on a planetary scale. The stakes are at their highest ever. This is breakthrough or breakdown: climate, environmental issues and food-production will probably be critical, but our group-psychological capacity to handle breakthrough and its implications will be equally so. The Uranus-Neptune square (transition-point of the cycle begun at the conjunction in 1993) in 2039-41 is closely followed by a Uranus-Pluto opposition (climax of the cycle beginning in 1965) in 2046-48. Tests of power at the beginning, and a turning-over of reality towards the end. Henceforth things will undoubtedly be different. This is it: we will know by this time if we have mastered the world crisis or not.
The good news is that, by 2061-64, we will be launching into an entirely new chapter, heading toward a new horizon, on an utterly new basis. If there is ever one beginning to a 'new world', I'd guesstimate this to be the beginning of it - what preceded the 2060s will prove, in hindsight, to be preoccupied with the 'old world' of that time. The bad news is that we could be severely reduced in number and lifestyle to a shadow of our former state, if that. It all depends on what we have previously done and not done. In the 2060s we see the Neptune-Pluto square, the first transition-point of a 500-year megacycle beginning in the 1890s, during the Victorian Age and the germination of the global village. It concerns the building of a civilisation and cycle of history which has its peak in 2140 and its completion in the 2370s – just to get the time-perspective straight! The roots of this civilisation are concealed within the principles which have been working themselves out during the 20th Century – though I would hazard to suggest that the future civilisation might possess a radically different shape to ours. It has to, because the underlying ethic of destruction on which our civilisation is currently based cannot be perpetuated into the future. And the period of transition might well turn out to be the 1960s to the 2060s, with its midpoint around 2010-15.
Much more... --
http://www.palden.co.uk/palden/pal-4-70.html