Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Childish superstition": Einstein's letter makes view of religion relatively clear

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 02:45 AM
Original message
"Childish superstition": Einstein's letter makes view of religion relatively clear
Due to be auctioned this week in London after being in a private collection for more than 50 years, the document leaves no doubt that the theoretical physicist was no supporter of religious beliefs, which he regarded as "childish superstitions".

Einstein penned the letter on January 3 1954 to the philosopher Eric Gutkind who had sent him a copy of his book Choose Life: The Biblical Call to Revolt. The letter went on public sale a year later and has remained in private hands ever since.

In the letter, he states: "The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."

<snip>


http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/12/peopleinscience.religion
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cue the whining
Such as here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3306812&mesg_id=3306886

"B-b-but that's just one letter! Maybe he changed his mind!" Oh, and I see Zeitgeist The Bloody Movie crops up again in that thread, as the answer to everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hmmm
I'm thinking that this might have to be posted in R/T...:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We can also expect a lot of "I believe that the universe is god" nonsense
Personally, I find that kind of tepid pantheism to be a pretty inane position, because it simultaneously creates god and strips it of any relevance. Two things fundamentally indistinguishable from one another (eg., "god" and "the universe") are in fact one thing. Where's Occam's Razor when you really need to make the cut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Occams razor is a tool used by us
fundamentalist scientists ya know! Only agnostics have it right! I don't know so therefore no one else can ever know! Sheesh..Thats MORE annoying than the quantum woos, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What about quantum agnostics?
Because, see, modern quantuum science proves that you can never prove anything for sure, right, so agnosticism is the only sensible position? Schroedinger proved this with that experiment with a teapot, or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-17-08 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. "Erwin, what the hell did you do to the cat?"--Mrs. Schroedinger
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't forget his deathbed conversion to Jebus
which is the favorite myth of the religious loony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. i think Darwin's
wins that particular award
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Science & Skepticism » Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC